Utility of prediction model score: a proposed tool to standardize the performance and generalizability of clinical predictive models based on systematic review
- PMID: 33636704
- DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE20963
Utility of prediction model score: a proposed tool to standardize the performance and generalizability of clinical predictive models based on systematic review
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and performance of current prediction models in the fields of spine metastasis and degenerative spine disease to create a scoring system that allows direct comparison of the prediction models.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed to identify relevant studies that included either the proposal of a prediction model or an external validation of a previously proposed prediction model with 1-year outcomes. Characteristics of the original study and discriminative performance of external validations were then assigned points based on thresholds from the overall cohort.
Results: Nine prediction models were included in the spine metastasis category, while 6 prediction models were included in the degenerative spine category. After assigning the proposed utility of prediction model score to the spine metastasis prediction models, only 1 reached the grade of excellent, while 2 were graded as good, 3 as fair, and 3 as poor. Of the 6 included degenerative spine models, 1 reached the excellent grade, while 3 studies were graded as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as poor.
Conclusions: As interest in utilizing predictive analytics in spine surgery increases, there is a concomitant increase in the number of published prediction models that differ in methodology and performance. Prior to applying these models to patient care, these models must be evaluated. To begin addressing this issue, the authors proposed a grading system that compares these models based on various metrics related to their original design as well as internal and external validation. Ultimately, this may hopefully aid clinicians in determining the relative validity and usability of a given model.
Keywords: degenerative; diagnostic technique; generalizability; oncology; performance; prediction model; predictive analytics; prognostic; spine metastasis; survival.
Similar articles
-
Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(23):1-57. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074401 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting tumor-specific survival in patients with spinal metastatic renal cell carcinoma: which scoring system is most accurate?J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Jun 5;33(4):529-539. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.SPINE20173. Print 2020 Oct 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020. PMID: 32502990
-
How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2300-2308. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001305. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32433107 Free PMC article.
-
Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review.Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E10. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18331. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 30453453
-
Lack of Prognostic Model Validation in Low Back Pain Prediction Studies: A Systematic Review.Clin J Pain. 2018 Aug;34(8):748-754. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000591. Clin J Pain. 2018. PMID: 29406366
Cited by
-
Determining patients with spinal metastases suitable for surgical intervention: A cost-effective analysis.Cancer Med. 2023 Oct;12(19):20059-20069. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6576. Epub 2023 Sep 25. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37749979 Free PMC article.
-
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38517402 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.J Bone Oncol. 2025 Apr 24;52:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100682. eCollection 2025 Jun. J Bone Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40337637 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of 99 extremity bone malignancy survival prediction models.J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Jan 28;26(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00821-6. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 39873938 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials