Serum Fibrosis Marker Panels FIB-4 Index and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) Are Equivalent to AST Alone at Predicting Liver Fibrosis in a Cohort of 1731 Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus
- PMID: 33636957
- DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2016.022509
Serum Fibrosis Marker Panels FIB-4 Index and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) Are Equivalent to AST Alone at Predicting Liver Fibrosis in a Cohort of 1731 Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus
Abstract
Background: Efficient tools are needed to stage liver disease before treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Compared to biopsy, several studies demonstrated favorable performance of noninvasive multianalyte serum fibrosis marker panels [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index] and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), but suggested cutoffs vary widely. Our objective was to evaluate FIB-4 index and APRI and their component tests for staging fibrosis in our HCV-infected population and to determine practical cutoffs to help triage an influx of patients requiring treatment.
Methods: Transient elastography (TE) results from 1731 HCV-infected patients were mapped to an F0-F4 equivalent scale. Each patient's APRI and FIB-4 index were calculated. Areas under the receiver operator curve (AUROCs) and false-positive and false-negative rates were calculated to retrospectively compare the performance of the indices and their component tests.
Results: The highest AUROCs for distinguishing severe (F3-F4) from mild-to-moderate (F0-F2) fibrosis had overlapping 95% CIs: APRI (0.77; 0.74-0.79), FIB-4 index (0.76; 0.73-0.78), and AST (0.74; 0.72-0.77). Cutoffs had false-negative rates of 2.7%-2.8% and false-positive rates of 6.4%-7.4% for all 3 markers.
Conclusions: AST was as effective as FIB-4 index and APRI at predicting fibrosis. Published cutoffs for APRI and FIB-4 index would have been inappropriate in our population, with false-negative rates as high as 11%. For our purposes, no serum fibrosis marker was sufficiently sensitive to rule-out significant fibrosis, but cutoffs developed for AST, FIB-4 index, and APRI all had specificities of 79.2%-80.3% for ruling-in severe fibrosis and could be used to triage 1/3 of our population for treatment without waiting for TE or liver biopsy.
© 2017 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
Similar articles
-
Noninvasive serum fibrosis markers for screening and staging chronic hepatitis C virus patients in a large US cohort.Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;57(2):240-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit245. Epub 2013 Apr 16. Clin Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23592832 Free PMC article.
-
The Roles of Fibrosis Index Based on Four Factors and Aspartate Transaminase-to-Platelet Ratio Index Scoring Systems as an Alternative to Transient Elastography Liver Stiffness in Liver Fibrosis Staging in Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Co-Infected Patients.Gastroenterology Res. 2021 Aug;14(4):209-213. doi: 10.14740/gr1377. Epub 2021 Jul 28. Gastroenterology Res. 2021. PMID: 34527089 Free PMC article.
-
AST/ALT ratio, APRI, and FIB-4 compared to FibroScan for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran.BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 11;23(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02780-w. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37170243 Free PMC article.
-
Does Incorporating Change in APRI or FIB-4 Indices Over Time Improve the Accuracy of a Single Index for Identifying Liver Fibrosis in Persons With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection?J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;52(1):60-66. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000753. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 27875352
-
Validation of the FIB-4 index for evaluation of fibrosis in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation: A single center experience.Hepatol Res. 2016 Jul;46(8):752-7. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12617. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Hepatol Res. 2016. PMID: 26583748
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous