Letter to the editor regarding: Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study)

Affiliations

¹ Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA fsa2101@columbia.edu.
² Radiology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
³ Radiology, Boston University Medical Campus, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁴ Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
⁵ Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA.
⁶ Radiology, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.

Comment

Firas Ahmed et al. Gut. 2022 Jan.

. 2022 Jan;71(1):214-215.

doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324396. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

¹ Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA fsa2101@columbia.edu.
² Radiology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
³ Radiology, Boston University Medical Campus, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁴ Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
⁵ Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA.
⁶ Radiology, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.

No abstract available

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer screening; screening.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study).
Cash BD, Fleisher MR, Fern S, Rajan E, Haithcock R, Kastenberg DM, Pound D, Papageorgiou NP, Fernández-Urién I, Schmelkin IJ, Rex DK. Cash BD, et al. Gut. 2021 Nov;70(11):2115-2122. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322578. Epub 2020 Dec 18. Gut. 2021. PMID: 33443017 Clinical Trial.