Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul;106(7):975-979.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318026. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of clinical outcomes of conbercept versus ranibizumab treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a multicentral prospective randomised controlled trial

Zhenquan Wu et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the recurrence rate and surgical complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) between patients treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) and intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) within 6 months.

Methods: A multicentral prospective, randomised controlled trial was applied from May 2017 to February 2019 for the infants diagnosed as aggressive posterior-ROP, zone I or posterior zone II treatment-requiring ROP by binocular indirect ophthalmoscope and RetCam3. These infants were assigned to randomly receive either intravitreal injection of 0.25 mg conbercept or 0.25 mg ranibizumab. The recurrence rate, fundus fluorescence angiography (FFA) and surgical complications were examined during the follow-up period of 6 months. Recurrent eyes were retreated by laser or another intravitreal injection within the 72 hours.

Results: A total of 30 infant patients (60 eyes) underwent IVC and 30 patients (60 eyes) underwent IVR. A total of 10 eyes (16.67%) in the IVC group and 14 eyes (23.34%) in the IVR group developed recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ2=0.83, p=0.36). The postmenstrual age (PMA) at first injection was (34.60±3.47) weeks in IVC and (35.14±1.76) in IVR group. In recurrent cases, the mean PMA at second treatment were (43.31±3.85) and (43.43±3.89) weeks in the IVC and IVR group, respectively. The period between two treatments was (8.71±6.62) for the IVC and (8.29±2.56) weeks for the IVR group. All these results showed no significant statistical difference between these two groups. The fluorescein leakage were observed in the eyes of recurrent infants by FFA. There were no other complications in the two groups except for complicated cataract in three eyes.

Conclusion: Both IVC and IVR are effective therapies for the treatment of ROP. Conbercept is a new option for treating ROP.

Keywords: drugs; retina; treatment other.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fundus images of no recurrence cases. (A–D) fundus images in the IVC group. (E–H) fundus images in the IVR group. (A, E) images before IVI shows plus disease and ridge. (B, F) regression of plus disease and ridge was observed at 1 week after treatment. (C, G) one month after treatment. (D, H) six months after treatment. No recurrence occurred during the 6 months follow-up. IVC, intravitreal injection of conbercept; IVI, intravitreal injection; IVR, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fundus images of recurrence cases. (A–E) fundus images in the IVC group. (F–J) fundus images in the IVR group. (A, F) Images before IVI shows plus disease and ridge. (B, G) Regression of plus disease and ridge was observed at 1 week after treatment. (C, H) aggravated plus disease and ridge was observed during follow-up. (D, I) FFA shows the retinal neovascularisation and fluorescence. (E, J) six months after IVI. No new recurrence was observed after secondary treatment. FFA, fundus fluorescence angiography; IVC, intravitreal injection of conbercept; IVR, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fierson WM, et al. , American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Ophthalmology . Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2018;142:e20183061. 10.1542/peds.2018-3061 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Lawn JE, Vazquez T, et al. . Preterm-associated visual impairment and estimates of retinopathy of prematurity at regional and global levels for 2010. Pediatr Res 2013;74 Suppl 1:35–49. 10.1038/pr.2013.205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartnett ME, Penn JS. Mechanisms and management of retinopathy of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2013;368:239–43. 10.1097/01.SA.0000433219.95127.da - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jin E, Yin H, Li X, et al. . Short-Term outcomes after intravitreal injections of CONBERCEPT versus ranibizumab for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Retina 2018;38:1595–604. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palmer EA. Results of U.S. randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy for ROP (CRYO-ROP). Doc Ophthalmol 1990;74:245–51. 10.1007/BF02482615 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types