Clinical and prognostic significances of cancer stem cell markers in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33639931
- PMCID: PMC7912890
- DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-01840-z
Clinical and prognostic significances of cancer stem cell markers in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is considered one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, which is accompanied by a poor prognosis. Although reports regarding the importance of cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in gastric cancer progression have rapidly developed over the last few decades, their clinicopathological and prognostic values in gastric cancer still remain inconclusive. Therefore, the current meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively re-evaluate the association of CSC markers expression, overall and individually, with GC patients' clinical and survival outcomes.
Methods: Literature databases including PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Embase were searched to identify the eligible articles. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were recorded or calculated to determine the relationships between CSC markers expression positivity and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS)/ cancer-specific survival (CSS), and clinicopathological features.
Results: We initially retrieved 4,425 articles, of which a total of 66 articles with 89 studies were considered as eligible for this meta-analysis, comprising of 11,274 GC patients. Overall data analyses indicated that the overexpression of CSC markers is associated with TNM stage (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.84-2.61, P = 0.013), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.54-2.02, P < 0.001), worse OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.54-1.77, P < 0.001), poor CSS/DSS (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.33-2.15, P < 0.001), and unfavorable DFS/RFS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.90-2.89, P < 0.001) in GC patients. However, CSC markers expression was found to be slightly linked to tumor differentiation (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, P = 0.035). Sub-analysis demonstrated a significant positive relationship between most of the individual markers, specially Gli-1, Oct-4, CD44, CD44V6, and CD133, and clinical outcomes as well as the reduced survival, whereas overexpression of Lgr-5, Nanog, and sonic hedgehog (Shh) was not found to be related to the majority of clinical outcomes in GC patients.
Conclusion: The expression of CSC markers is mostly associated with worse outcomes in patients with GC, both overall and individual. The detection of a combined panel of CSC markers might be appropriate as a prognostic stratification marker to predict tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in patients with GC, which probably results in identifying novel potential targets for therapeutic approaches.
Keywords: Cancer stem cells; Clinicopathological characteristics; Gastric cancer; Meta-analysis; Prognostic value.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Oncogenic functions and clinical significances of DCLK1 isoforms in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Cell Int. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02632-9. Cancer Cell Int. 2022. PMID: 35717205 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of PD-L1 in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 30;10:962. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00962. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31616289 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer stem cell markers predict a poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 4;7(40):65862-65875. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11672. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27588469 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic value of CD44 expression in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.Biomed Pharmacother. 2014 Jul;68(6):693-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 14. Biomed Pharmacother. 2014. PMID: 25194445
-
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:537140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.537140. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33777726 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Unmasking the Deceptive Nature of Cancer Stem Cells: The Role of CD133 in Revealing Their Secrets.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 30;24(13):10910. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310910. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37446085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of cancer stem cell heterogeneity in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):1265-1281. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1286. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Transl Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 40104739 Free PMC article.
-
Inflammation-Associated Stem Cells in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Their Utility as Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;16(18):3134. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183134. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39335106 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological Significance of Cancer Stem Cell Markers (OCT-3/4 and SOX-2) in Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 28;11(4):1040. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041040. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37189658 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer stem cells: an insight into the development of metastatic tumors and therapy resistance.Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023 Aug;19(6):1577-1595. doi: 10.1007/s12015-023-10529-x. Epub 2023 May 2. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023. PMID: 37129728 Review.
References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous