Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light
- PMID: 33640513
- PMCID: PMC8887048
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.074
Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light
Abstract
Cutaneous photobiology studies have focused primarily on the ultraviolet portion of the solar spectrum. Visible light (VL), which comprises 50% of the electromagnetic radiation that reaches the Earth's surface and, as discussed in Part I of this CME, has cutaneous biologic effects, such as pigment darkening and erythema. Photoprotection against VL includes avoiding the sun, seeking shade, and using photoprotective clothing. The organic and inorganic ultraviolet filters used in sunscreens do not protect against VL, only tinted sunscreens do. In the United States, these filters are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration as an over-the-counter drug and are subject to more stringent regulations than in Europe, Asia, and Australia. There are no established guidelines regarding VL photoprotection. Alternative measures to confer VL photoprotection are being explored. These novel methods include topical, oral, and subcutaneous agents. Further development should focus on better protection in the ultraviolet A1 (340-400 nm) and VL ranges while enhancing the cosmesis of the final products.
Keywords: inorganic filter; light filter; organic filter; photolyase; photoprotection; sunblock; sunscreen; ultraviolet light; visible light; visible light photoprotection.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest Dr Lim is an investigator for Incyte, L'Oreal, Pfizer, and PCORI, has served as a consultant for Pierre Fabre, ISDIN, Ferndale, Galderma, and La Roche-Posay, and has participated as a speaker in general educational session for Johnson and Johnson, Ra Medical System, La Roche-Posay, and Cantabria labs. Dr Kohli is an investigator (grant funding received by the institution) for Ferndale, Estee Lauder, L’Oreal, Unigen, Johnson and Johnson, Allergan, and Bayer and is a consultant (fee and equipment received by the institution) for Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Bayer. Dr Jagdeo is a member of the GlobalMed Scientific advisory board and a consultant for UV Biotek. Dr Hamzavi is an investigator for Estee Lauder, Ferndale Laboratories, Galderma, Bayer, Loreal, Lenicura, and Unigen. Geisler, Austin, and Nguyen have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: A review of tinted sunscreens.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 May;84(5):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 Apr 23. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 32335182 Review.
-
Photoprotection of skin against ultraviolet A damage.Methods Enzymol. 2000;319:445-65. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)19042-1. Methods Enzymol. 2000. PMID: 10907533 No abstract available.
-
Visible light in photodermatology.Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020 Jan 22;19(1):99-104. doi: 10.1039/c9pp00425d. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020. PMID: 31922171 Review.
-
Natural products as photoprotection.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Mar;14(1):47-63. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12123. Epub 2015 Jan 12. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 25582033 Review.
-
Synergistic effects of long-wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light on pigmentation and erythema.Br J Dermatol. 2018 May;178(5):1173-1180. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15940. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Br J Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 28877342
Cited by
-
[Sunscreens of the future: challenges and opportunities].Hautarzt. 2022 Apr;73(4):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s00105-022-04959-w. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Hautarzt. 2022. PMID: 35258659 Review. German.
-
Does facial sunscreen usage impact radiographic image quality and radiation dose? An in vitro study.Oral Radiol. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1007/s11282-025-00819-0. Online ahead of print. Oral Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40158060
-
Review on photoprotection: a clinician's guide to the ingredients, characteristics, adverse effects, and disease-specific benefits of chemical and physical sunscreen compounds.Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 May;315(4):735-749. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02483-4. Epub 2022 Nov 28. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023. PMID: 36443500 Review.
-
Photoprotective activity from Colombian Caribbean brown algae using HPLC-DAD metabolic profiling by MCR-ALS data analysis.Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00734-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40346135 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Sunscreen Product Compared with Reference Standards P3, P5 and P8 in Outdoor Conditions: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Intra-individual Study in Healthy Subjects.Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;12(11):2531-2546. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00815-w. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022. PMID: 36173595 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wang SQ, Lim HW. Current status of the sunscreen regulation in the United States: 2011 Food and Drug Administration’s final rule on labeling and effectiveness testing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(4):863–869. - PubMed
-
- Gasparro FP, Mitchnick M, Nash JF. A review of sunscreen safety and efficacy. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;68(3):243–256. - PubMed
-
- Bens G Sunscreens. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;810:429–463. - PubMed
-
- Hojerova J, Medovcikova A, Mikula M. Photoprotective efficacy and photostability of fifteen sunscreen products having the same label SPF subjected to natural sunlight. Int J Pharm. 2011;408(1–2):27–38. - PubMed
-
- Jansen R, Wang SQ, Burnett M, Osterwalder U, Lim HW. Photoprotection: part I. Photoprotection by naturally occurring, physical, and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):853. e851–812; quiz 865–856. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources