Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Apr 27;143(17):1642-1654.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048996. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies of US Men and Women and a Meta-Analysis of 26 Cohort Studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality: Results From 2 Prospective Cohort Studies of US Men and Women and a Meta-Analysis of 26 Cohort Studies

Dong D Wang et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: The optimal intake levels of fruit and vegetables for maintaining long-term health are uncertain.

Methods: We followed 66 719 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2014) and 42 016 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) who were free from cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and diabetes at baseline. Diet was assessed using a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire at baseline and updated every 2 to 4 years. We also conducted a dose-response meta-analysis, including results from our 2 cohorts and 24 other prospective cohort studies.

Results: We documented 33 898 deaths during the follow-up. After adjustment for known and suspected confounding variables and risk factors, we observed nonlinear inverse associations of fruit and vegetable intake with total mortality and cause-specific mortality attributable to cancer, CVD, and respiratory disease (all Pnonlinear<0.001). Intake of ≈5 servings per day of fruit and vegetables, or 2 servings of fruit and 3 servings of vegetables, was associated with the lowest mortality, and above that level, higher intake was not associated with additional risk reduction. In comparison with the reference level (2 servings/d), daily intake of 5 servings of fruit and vegetables was associated with hazard ratios (95% CI) of 0.87 (0.85-0.90) for total mortality, 0.88 (0.83-0.94) for CVD mortality, 0.90 (0.86-0.95) for cancer mortality, and 0.65 (0.59-0.72) for respiratory disease mortality. The dose-response meta-analysis that included 145 015 deaths accrued in 1 892 885 participants yielded similar results (summary risk ratio of mortality for 5 servings/d=0.87 [95% CI, 0.85-0.88]; Pnonlinear<0.001). Higher intakes of most subgroups of fruits and vegetables were associated with lower mortality, with the exception of starchy vegetables such as peas and corn. Intakes of fruit juices and potatoes were not associated with total and cause-specific mortality.

Conclusions: Higher intakes of fruit and vegetables were associated with lower mortality; the risk reduction plateaued at ≈5 servings of fruit and vegetables per day. These findings support current dietary recommendations to increase intake of fruits and vegetables, but not fruit juices and potatoes.

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; diet; fruit; mortality; neoplasms; vegetables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Yanping Li has received research support from the California Walnut Commission and SwissRe Management Ltd. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Dose-response association between fruit and vegetable intake and mortality in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. (A) Dose-response associations of combined fruit and vegetable intake with total and cause-specific mortality. (B) Dose-response associations of fruit intake with total and cause-specific mortality. (C) Dose-response associations of vegetable intake with total and cause-specific mortality. Dose-response associations of fruit and vegetable intake with total and cause-specific mortality were estimated by restricted cubic spline Cox proportional-hazards model in a dataset that pooled data from both the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Multivariable model adjusted for age (in month), Caucasian (yes vs. no), moderate-vigorous physical activity (0, 0.1-0.9, 1.0-3.4, 3.5-5.9, ≥6 hours per week), smoking status (never, past, current 1-14 cigarettes/d, current 15-24 cigarettes/d, current ≥25 cigarettes/d), alcohol intake (women: 0, 0.1-4.9, 5.0-14.9, ≥15 g/d; men: 0, 0.1-4.9, 5.0-29.9, ≥30 g/d), multivitamin use (yes vs. no), current aspirin use (yes vs. no), family history of myocardial infarction (yes vs. no), family history of diabetes (yes vs. no), family history of cancer (yes vs. no), total energy intake (quintiles), menopausal status and hormone use in women (premenopausal, postmenopausal never users, postmenopausal past users, postmenopausal current users), baseline body-mass index (<23, 23-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, ≥35 kg/m2), history of hypertension (yes vs. no), history of hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no), the modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index (quintiles). All models, except that for total fruit and vegetable intake, also mutually adjusted for fruit intake and vegetable intake (in quintiles).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association between fruit and vegetable intake and total mortality in the dose-response meta-analysis based on 24 published studies, the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals’ Follow-Up Study. Dose-response relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and total mortality was estimated by the two-stage dose-response meta-analysis with the use of restricted cubic splines.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Micha R, Peñalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD and Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA. 2017;317:912–924. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, Abdulle AM, Abera SF, Aboyans V, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2013;2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1345–1422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th ed. December 2015. Available at https://health.gov/our-work/food-and-nutrition/2015-2020-dietary-guideli.... [Date accessed: December 26, 2020].
    1. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, De Jesus JM, Miller NH, Hubbard VS, Lee I-M, Lichtenstein AH, Loria CM and Millen BE. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2960–2984. - PubMed
    1. Joint World Health Organization / Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Report of the joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. February 2002. Available at https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/trs916/download/en/. [Date accessed: December 26, 2020].

Publication types