Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 12:12:611881.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.611881. eCollection 2021.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Mycotoxin Production During Postharvest Decay and Their Influence on Tritrophic Host-Pathogen-Microbe Interactions

Affiliations
Review

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Mycotoxin Production During Postharvest Decay and Their Influence on Tritrophic Host-Pathogen-Microbe Interactions

Holly P Bartholomew et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Mycotoxins are a prevalent problem for stored fruits, grains, and vegetables. Alternariol, aflatoxin, and patulin, produced by Alternaria spp., Aspergillus spp., and Penicillium spp., are the major mycotoxins that negatively affect human and animal health and reduce fruit and produce quality. Control strategies for these toxins are varied, but one method that is increasing in interest is through host microbiome manipulation, mirroring a biocontrol approach. While the majority of mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites (SM) produced by fungi impact host-fungal interactions, there is also an interplay between the various organisms within the host microbiome. In addition to SMs, these interactions involve compounds such as signaling molecules, plant defense and growth hormones, and metabolites produced by both the plants and microbial community. Therefore, studies to understand the impact of the various toxins impacting the beneficial and harmful microorganisms that reside within the microbiome is warranted, and could lead to identification of safe analogs for antimicrobial activity to reduce fruit decay. Additionally, exploring the composition of the microbial carposphere of host plants is likely to shed light on developing a microbial consortium to maintain quality during storage and abate mycotoxin contamination.

Keywords: biocontrol; biofilm; carposphere; metabolite; microbiome; mycotoxin; postharvest pathogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The relationship between the host, pathogen and biofilm is an intricate process containing multiple components. Hormones, volatile organic compounds (VOC), and signaling molecules, such as ethylene, gibberellin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and brassinosteroids, are translocated throughout the fruit as well as produced by microbes and used in postharvest control efforts. Mycotoxins like aflatoxin, patulin, and alternariol are produced by phytopathogenic fungi, and quorum sensing molecules (acyl-homoserine-lactones and autoinducer peptides) are secreted by biofilm-forming microbes. Elicitors are recognized by the fruit in response to pathogens, resulting in an oxidative burst. Both plant and microbial cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDE) and additional antimicrobial compounds are released to manipulate the surrounding species composition. These molecules and abiotic factors during postharvest storage can impact virulence or disease susceptibility, growth, and development of all the interacting organisms within the carposphere. Color variety within molecule categories represents variability within the grouping (e.g., multiple hormones present in the interaction). This figure was produced using Biorender.com.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Impacts of signaling molecules (center; example molecules listed clockwise are ethylene, salicylic acid, abscisic acid, and jasmonic acid) on the microbial composition associated with the host (left) and direct fruit host processes (right). In addition to influencing their own biology and/or populations, producers of these molecules can also impact other species within the vicinity, including facilitating interactions between the host fruit and carposphere. This figure was produced using Biorender.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelfattah A., Li Destri Nicosia M. G., Cacciola S. O., Droby S., Schena L. (2015). Metabarcoding analysis of fungal diversity in the phyllosphere and carposphere of olive (Olea europaea). PLoS One 10:e0131069. 10.1371/journal.pone.0131069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdelfattah A., Wisniewski M., Droby S., Schena L. (2016). Spatial and compositional variation in the fungal communities of organic and conventionally grown apple fruit at the consumer point-of-purchase. Horticulture Res. 3:16047. 10.1038/hortres.2016.47 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmad T., Liu Y., Shujian H., Moosa A. (2020). First record of alternaria alternata causing postharvest fruit rot of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in China. Plant Dis. 104 2030–2030. 10.1094/pdis-11-19-2322-pdn - DOI
    1. Alkan N., Fortes A. M. (2015). Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 6:889. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00889 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alshannaq A., Yu J.-H. (2017). Occurrence, toxicity, and analysis of major mycotoxins in food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:632. 10.3390/ijerph14060632 - DOI - PMC - PubMed