Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 1;15(1):1-5.
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.200248.

Myelomeningocele: a new functional classification

Affiliations

Myelomeningocele: a new functional classification

Luciano S Dias et al. J Child Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: In myelomeningocele, several classifications have been used. The present manuscript proposes a new functional classification to better assess the prognosis and management of these patients.

Methods: The manual muscle test is what defines the actual group in which the patient should be included. Furthermore, this new classification brings information about the bracing and external supports recommended to each functional level. We also recommend that the patient's Functional Mobility Scale should always be mentioned together with their functional level.

Results: The four levels in this classification are MMFC1, MMFC2, MMFC3 and MMFC4. The MMFC1 group includes patients with significant muscle weakness. They need to use high braces crossing the hip joint with a walker to achieve some ambulation. The MMFC2 group includes patients who have functional hip flexors, knee extensors and knee flexors. However, the hip abductors are quite weak. These patients usually need to use a walker - or crutches - and Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFOs). The MMFC3 group includes patients with functional hip flexors, knee extensors, knee flexors and hip abductors. However, the ankle plantar flexion function is absent. Most of them are able to walk independently, only using AFOs without any external support. The MMFC4 group includes patients who have preserved function in the entire lower limb musculature. These patients don't need any assistive devices to achieve an adequate ambulation pattern.

Conclusions: We hope that this new classification is a system that is simple to understand, serves as a gait prognosis guide and facilitates communication among healthcare professionals.

Level of evidence: V.

Keywords: ambulatory function; classification; functional mobility scale; myelomeningocele; spina bifida.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) classification patients rated at 5 m (e.g. home), 50 m (e.g. school) and 500 m (e.g. shopping mall). A rating of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 is given for each distance (reproduced with permission from Kerr Graham)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kural C, Sungur I, Kaya I, et al. . Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures. Orthopedics 2010;27:801. - PubMed
    1. Ilyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures—classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;27:167-173. - PubMed
    1. Cheng J, Liu P, Sun D, et al. . Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J 2017;27:1477-1482. - PubMed
    1. Rethlefsen SA, Ryan DD, Kay RM. Classification systems in cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am 2010;27:457-467. - PubMed
    1. Lenarz CJ, Place HM, Lenke LG, Alander DH, Oliver D. Comparative reliability of 3 thoracolumbar fracture classification systems. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;27:422-427. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources