Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 16:11:05005.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05005.

Mathematical modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Qatar and its impact on the national response to COVID-19

Affiliations

Mathematical modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Qatar and its impact on the national response to COVID-19

Houssein H Ayoub et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Mathematical modeling constitutes an important tool for planning robust responses to epidemics. This study was conducted to guide the Qatari national response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic. The study investigated the epidemic's time-course, forecasted health care needs, predicted the impact of social and physical distancing restrictions, and rationalized and justified easing of restrictions.

Methods: An age-structured deterministic model was constructed to describe SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics and disease progression throughout the population.

Results: The enforced social and physical distancing interventions flattened the epidemic curve, reducing the peaks for incidence, prevalence, acute-care hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalizations by 87%, 86%, 76%, and 78%, respectively. The daily number of new infections was predicted to peak at 12 750 on May 23, and active-infection prevalence was predicted to peak at 3.2% on May 25. Daily acute-care and ICU-care hospital admissions and occupancy were forecast accurately and precisely. By October 15, 2020, the basic reproduction number R0 had varied between 1.07-2.78, and 50.8% of the population were estimated to have been infected (1.43 million infections). The proportion of actual infections diagnosed was estimated at 11.6%. Applying the concept of Rt tuning, gradual easing of restrictions was rationalized and justified to start on June 15, 2020, when Rt declined to 0.7, to buffer the increased interpersonal contact with easing of restrictions and to minimize the risk of a second wave. No second wave has materialized as of October 15, 2020, five months after the epidemic peak.

Conclusions: Use of modeling and forecasting to guide the national response proved to be a successful strategy, reducing the toll of the epidemic to a manageable level for the health care system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model predictions for evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the total population of Qatar. Panel A. Incidence (number of daily new infections). Panel B. Cumulative number of infections. Panel C. Active-infection prevalence (those latently infected or infectious). Panel D. Attack rate (proportion ever infected).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model predictions for evolution of COVID-19 disease cases. Panel A. Daily hospital admissions in acute-care beds. Panel B. Daily hospital admissions in ICU-care beds. Panel C. Cumulative number of hospitalizations in acute-care beds. Panel D. Cumulative number of hospitalizations in ICU-care beds. Panel E. Hospital occupancy of COVID-19 patients (number of beds occupied at any given time) in acute-care beds. Panel F. Hospital occupancy of COVID-19 patients (number of beds occupied at any given time) in ICU-care beds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rationale and criteria used for the start of easing of social and physical distancing restrictions. Panels A-C show the model fit and results at the time when the policy decision was actually made. An updated prediction for Rt is in Figure S4 of the Online Supplementary Document. Panel A. Effective reproduction number Rt and easing of social and physical distancing restrictions. Panel B. Prediction of the number of daily new infections with early easing of restrictions, three weeks before the epidemic peak. Panel C. Prediction of the number of daily new infections with delayed easing of restrictions, three weeks after the epidemic peak. Panel D. The number of daily new diagnosed and laboratory-confirmed infections.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impact of social and physical distancing interventions. Panel A. Number of daily new infections. Panel B. Active-infection prevalence (those latently infected or infectious). Panel C. Daily hospital admissions in acute-care beds. Panel D. Daily hospital admissions in ICU-care beds.

References

    1. Kretzschmar M.Disease modeling for public health: added value, challenges, and institutional constraints. J Public Health Policy. 2020;41:39-51. 10.1057/s41271-019-00206-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muscatello DJ, Chughtai AA, Heywood A, Gardner LM, Heslop DJ, MacIntyre CR.Translation of Real-Time Infectious Disease Modeling into Routine Public Health Practice. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:e161720. 10.3201/eid2305.161720 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Kerkhove MD, Ferguson NM.Epidemic and intervention modelling–a scientific rationale for policy decisions? Lessons from the 2009 influenza pandemic. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:306-10. 10.2471/BLT.11.097949 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.
    1. Planning and Statistics Authority-State of Qatar. The Simplified Census of Population, Housing & Establishments. 2019. Available https://www.psa.gov.qa/en/statistics/Statistical%20Releases/Population/P.... Accessed: 2 April 2020.