A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
- PMID: 33644837
- PMCID: PMC8280018
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0
A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of right hemicolectomy with CME performed with laparoscopic and open surgery.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched. Primary outcome was the overall number of harvested lymph nodes. Secondary outcomes were short and long-term course variables. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios.
Results: Twenty-one studies were identified with 5038 patients enrolled. The difference in number of harvested lymph nodes was not statistically significant (MD 0.68, - 0.41-1.76, P = 0.22). The only RCT shows a significant advantage in favour of laparoscopy (MD 3.30, 95% CI - 0.20-6.40, P = 0.04). The analysis of CCTs showed an advantage in favour of the laparoscopic group, but the result was not statically significantly (MD - 0.55, 95% CI - 0.57-1.67, P = 0.33). The overall incidence of local recurrence was not different between the groups, while systemic recurrence at 5 years was lower in laparoscopic group. Laparoscopy showed better short-term outcomes including overall complications, lower estimated blood loss, lower wound infections and shorter hospital stay, despite a longer operative time. The rate of anastomotic and chyle leak was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: Despite the several limitations of this study, we found that the median number of lymph node harvested in the laparoscopic group is not different compared to open surgery. Laparoscopy was associated with a lower incidence of systemic recurrence.
Keywords: CME colectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Open surgery; Right hemicolectomy.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Global Cancers Observatory: Fact sheets cancers. Available at http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-cancers. Accessed 24 march 2020
-
- Lu JY, Xu L, Xue HD, Zhou WX, Xu T, Qiu HZ, Wu B, Lin GL, Xiao Y. The radical extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic right colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1710-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society: Treating Colorectal Cancer. Available at https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/treating.html. Accessed 24 march 2020
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
