Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;27(3):339-353.
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.3.339.

Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries

Affiliations

Qualitative exploration of factors influencing the plan selection process by Medicare beneficiaries

Yi Zhao et al. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because Medicare plan coverage and costs change annually and older adults, the major beneficiaries of Medicare, are faced with multiple health conditions and changing medical needs, Medicare beneficiaries should evaluate their options during open enrollment every year. However, because of the complexity of plan selection, it may be challenging for Medicare beneficiaries to make an appropriate decision from among competing options. OBJECTIVES: To (a) identify factors that beneficiaries consider having influenced their plan selection decision and (b) describe the decision-making process according to the consumer decision-making model (CDM). The 2 research questions guiding this study included (a) factors Medicare beneficiaries considered having influenced their Medicare plan selection decision and (b) characteristics of decision-making processes employed by Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This is a phenomenological qualitative study. Semistructured in-person or telephone interviews with Alabama residents who have Medicare as the sole insurance provider were conducted between June and August 2019. Participant recruitment continued until reaching the saturation point. Each interview session consisted of structured questions identifying characteristics of participants and open-ended questions used to elicit participant Medicare plan decisionmaking process and factors affecting their decision. Data were analyzed using content analysis with a process of qualitative inductive coding. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed. Twenty codes were identified and categorized into 5 themes regarding the factors influencing plan selection decisions by beneficiaries. When making a plan selection, participants were influenced by plan attributes (including cost, coverage, access to doctors, region, quality rating, and transportation); information resources and personal assistance; knowledge about Medicare; status and changes in personal situation; and experience with Medicare. Additionally, we identified 7 codes relating to beneficiary characteristics during decision-making processes, including being proactive, setting priorities, limiting choices, evaluating plans against personal needs, acquiescing to recommendations, sticking to the status quo, and weighing trade-offs. We consulted the CDM and created a conceptual model demonstrating a 5-step Medicare plan selection decision-making process and the factors influencing that process. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Auburn University Undergraduate Research Program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. CONCLUSIONS: This study created a step-by-step decision flowchart of Medicare plan selection to illustrate the complexity of the plan selection that Medicare beneficiaries must use. We uncovered the plan selection decision-making process among Medicare beneficiaries and factors affecting that process. Drawing from the CDM and the study findings, we developed a conceptual model. Findings will help researchers and community agencies target Medicare beneficiaries with different needs for assistance and design decision-making interventions/tools to help beneficiaries make rational decisions when selecting Medicare plans. These findings suggest that health care professionals should be involved in assistance programs to maximize efficiency of Medicare plan selection and to improve monitoring and consulting mechanisms to ensure the reliability of assistance information and services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study was supported by the Auburn University Undergraduate Research Program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Medicare Plan Selection Decision-Making Flowchart
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A Conceptual Model of Medicare Plan Selection Decision-Making Process and Influencing Factors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobson G, Freed M, Damico A, Neuman T; Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicare Advantage 2020 spotlight: first look. October 24, 2019. Accessed January 29, 2021. https://www.kff.org/report-section/medicare-advantage-2020-spotlight-fir...
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation. An overview of the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit. October 14, 2020. Accessed January 29, 2021. https://www.kff.org/medicare/fact-sheet/an-overview-of-the-medicare-part...
    1. Marzilli Ericson KM. Consumer inertia and firm pricing in the Medicare Part D prescription drug insurance exchange. Am Econ J: Econ Policy. 2014;6(1):38-64.
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation. An overview of Medicare. February 13, 2019. Accessed January 29, 2021. https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/an-overview-of-medicare/
    1. Salive ME. Multimorbidity in older adults. Epidemiol Rev 2013;35:75-83. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources