Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;103(3):151-154.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7146.

Theatre ventilation

C Theodorou  1 , G S Simpson  1 , C J Walsh  2
Affiliations
Review

Theatre ventilation

C Theodorou et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant disruption to all surgical specialties. In the UK, units have cancelled elective surgery and a decrease in aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) was favoured. Centres around the world advocate the use of negative pressure environments for AGPs in reducing the spread of infectious airborne particles. We present an overview of operating theatre ventilation systems and the respective evidence with relation to surgical site infection (SSI) and airborne pathogen transmission in light of COVID-19.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases. Search terms included "COVID-19", "theatre ventilation", "laminar", "turbulent" and "negative pressure".

Findings: Evidence for laminar flow ventilation in reducing the rate of SSI in orthopaedic surgery is widely documented. There is little evidence to support its use in general surgery. Following previous viral outbreaks, some centres have introduced negative pressure ventilation in an attempt to decrease exposure of airborne pathogens to staff and surrounding areas. This has again been suggested during the COVID-19 pandemic. A limited number of studies show some positive results for the use of negative pressure ventilation systems and reduction in spread of pathogens; however, cost, accessibility and duration of conversion remain an unexplored issue. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to advocate large scale conversion at this time. Nevertheless, it may be useful for each centre to have its own negative pressure room available for AGPs and high risk patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; General surgery; Laminar flow; Operating room; SARS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Laminar airflow
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conventional airflow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas AM, Simmons MJ. The effectiveness of ultra-clean air operating theatres in the prevention of deep infection in joint arthroplasty surgery. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B: 1264–1269.10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2018-0400.R1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Humphreys H, Taylor EW. Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50: 85–90.10.1053/jhin.2001.1126 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman PN, Williams J, Stacey Aet al. . Microbiological commissioning and monitoring of operating theatre suites. J Hosp Infect 2002; 52: 1–28.10.1053/jhin.2002.1237 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, Allegranzi Bet al. . Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 553–561.10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30059-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte Wet al. . Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed ) 1982; 285: 10–14.10.1136/bmj.285.6334.10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed