Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids
- PMID: 3364537
Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids
Abstract
Some patients with hearing impairment cannot use conventional hearing aids. One solution for these patients is the use of bone conduction hearing aids; however, this kind of equipment is associated with several problems related to the necessity for a good contact between the transducer and the temporal bone. Direct bone contact would be an ideal solution provided that safe and reaction-free skin penetration and a safe and permanent bone anchorage could be achieved. Brånemark et al have developed a procedure to furnish edentulous patients with fixed bridges using titanium implants. This report is focused on the clinical status of the soft tissue adjacent to the 67 skin-penetrating devices in 60 patients. The patients have been followed between 3 and 96 months on 313 occasions, which represents a total observation time of 1515 months of clinical performance. Only one implant was extracted due to adverse skin reaction, giving a failure rate of 0.07% per month. This is comparable with the failure rate of cardiac pacemakers 0.02-0.04% per month).
Similar articles
-
Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids.Am J Otol. 1981 Apr;2(4):304-10. Am J Otol. 1981. PMID: 6894824
-
Long-term follow-up with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985.Ear Nose Throat J. 1994 Feb;73(2):112-4. Ear Nose Throat J. 1994. PMID: 8168443
-
Anatomical results with titanium implants in the mastoid region.Ear Nose Throat J. 1997 Apr;76(4):231-4, 236. Ear Nose Throat J. 1997. PMID: 9127522
-
Titanium-anchored prostheses in otology.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1996 Apr;29(2):301-10. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1996. PMID: 8860928 Review.
-
[Implantable bone conduction hearing aids].Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(10):239-43. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997. PMID: 9324864 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review.Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;45(5):667-680. doi: 10.1111/coa.13556. Epub 2020 May 25. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32386454 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Soft Tissue Preservation Surgery With Hydroxyapatite-Coated Abutments Compared to Traditional Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant Surgery-A Pragmatic Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.Front Surg. 2020 Mar 5;7:5. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00005. eCollection 2020. Front Surg. 2020. PMID: 32211417 Free PMC article.
-
Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;273(12):4185-4192. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4106-2. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 27250841
-
Functional and patient-reported outcomes of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): A prospective case series study.J Otol. 2023 Jan;18(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 11. J Otol. 2023. PMID: 36820157 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiome on the Bone-Anchored Hearing System: A Prospective Study.Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;10:799. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00799. eCollection 2019. Front Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31105654 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical