Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;9(3):e25289.
doi: 10.2196/25289.

Using Fitbit as an mHealth Intervention Tool to Promote Physical Activity: Potential Challenges and Solutions

Guilherme M Balbim #  1 , Isabela G Marques  2 , David X Marquez  1 , Darshilmukesh Patel  3 , Lisa K Sharp  4 , Spyros Kitsiou #  5 , Sharmilee M Nyenhuis #  6
Affiliations

Using Fitbit as an mHealth Intervention Tool to Promote Physical Activity: Potential Challenges and Solutions

Guilherme M Balbim et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Consumer-based physical activity (PA) trackers, also known as wearables, are increasingly being used in research studies as intervention or measurement tools. One of the most popular and widely used brands of PA trackers is Fitbit. Since the release of the first Fitbit in 2009, hundreds of experimental studies have used Fitbit devices to facilitate PA self-monitoring and behavior change via goal setting and feedback tools. Fitbit's ability to capture large volumes of PA and physiological data in real time creates enormous opportunities for researchers. At the same time, however, it introduces a number of challenges (eg, technological, operational, logistical), most of which are not sufficiently described in study publications. Currently, there are no technical reports, guidelines, nor other types of publications discussing some of these challenges and offering guidance to researchers on how to best incorporate Fitbit devices in their study design and intervention to achieve their research goals. As a result, researchers are often left alone to discover and address some of these issues during the study through "trial and error." This paper aims to address this gap. Drawing on our cumulative experience of conducting multiple studies with various Fitbit PA trackers over the years, we present and discuss various key challenges associated with the use of Fitbit PA trackers in research studies. Difficulties with the use of Fitbit PA trackers are encountered throughout the entire research process. Challenges and solutions are categorized in 4 main categories: study preparation, intervention delivery, data collection and analysis, and study closeout. Subsequently, we describe a number of empirically tested strategies used in 4 of our interventional studies involving participants from a broad range of demographic characteristics, racial/ethnic backgrounds, and literacy levels. Researchers should be prepared to address challenges and issues in a timely fashion to ensure that the Fitbit effectively assists participants and researchers in achieving research and outcome goals.

Keywords: Fitbit; adults; fitness trackers; intervention; interventional studies; older adults; physical activity; smartphones; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM, Olson RD. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020–2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke TC, Schiller JS, Norris T. Early release of selected estimates based on data from January-June 2017 National Health Interview Survey. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2017. Dec, [2021-02-03]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/earlyrelease201712.pdf.
    1. Guthold R, Stevens G, Riley L, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. The Lancet Global Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077–e1086. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Number of wearable device users in the United States from 2014 to 2022. Statista. 2020. [2021-02-03]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/543070/number-of-wearable-users-in-t...
    1. Emery E, Woodhead E, Molinari V, Hunt MG. Treatment adherence in late-life. In: Lichtenberg PA, editor. Handbook of Assessment in Clinical Gerontology, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2010. pp. 427–457.

Publication types