Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug;30(4):401-426.
doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00236-z. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Targeted genome editing of plants and plant cells for biomanufacturing

Affiliations
Review

Targeted genome editing of plants and plant cells for biomanufacturing

J F Buyel et al. Transgenic Res. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Plants have provided humans with useful products since antiquity, but in the last 30 years they have also been developed as production platforms for small molecules and recombinant proteins. This initially niche area has blossomed with the growth of the global bioeconomy, and now includes chemical building blocks, polymers and renewable energy. All these applications can be described as "plant molecular farming" (PMF). Despite its potential to increase the sustainability of biologics manufacturing, PMF has yet to be embraced broadly by industry. This reflects a combination of regulatory uncertainty, limited information on process cost structures, and the absence of trained staff and suitable manufacturing capacity. However, the limited adaptation of plants and plant cells to the requirements of industry-scale manufacturing is an equally important hurdle. For example, the targeted genetic manipulation of yeast has been common practice since the 1980s, whereas reliable site-directed mutagenesis in most plants has only become available with the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 and similar genome editing technologies since around 2010. Here we summarize the applications of new genetic engineering technologies to improve plants as biomanufacturing platforms. We start by identifying current bottlenecks in manufacturing, then illustrate the progress that has already been made and discuss the potential for improvement at the molecular, cellular and organism levels. We discuss the effects of metabolic optimization, adaptation of the endomembrane system, modified glycosylation profiles, programmable growth and senescence, protease inactivation, and the expression of enzymes that promote biodegradation. We outline strategies to achieve these modifications by targeted gene modification, considering case-by-case examples of individual improvements and the combined modifications needed to generate a new general-purpose "chassis" for PMF.

Keywords: Chassis; Metabolic optimization; Modified glycosylation; Plant molecular farming; Programmable growth and senescence; Protease inactivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Potential limitations of plant-based processes for the industry-scale manufacturing of recombinant proteins. Several features of plants that affect their use as bioreactors and reduce the efficiency of the production process could be modified by genome editing to improve product quality, overall productivity and cost-efficiency. ERAD endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation, PTMs post-translational modifications
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Applications of genetic engineering and genome editing to improve plant molecular farming depending on the process stages (columns) and scales (rows). Every step during process development (columns) can benefit at the molecular, cellular and organism levels (rows). The aim of the improvements is to increase product yields, achieve authentic or compatible post-translational modifications, and integrate the use of residual biomass

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adsul M, Sandhu SK, Singhania RR, Gupta R, Puri SK, Mathur A. Designing a cellulolytic enzyme cocktail for the efficient and economical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2020;133:109442. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.109442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agapiou A, Vamvakari JP, Andrianopoulos A, Pappa A. Volatile emissions during storing of green food waste under different aeration conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(9):8890–8901. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6131-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alam A, Jiang L, Kittleson GA, Steadman KD, Nandi S, Fuqua JL, et al. Technoeconomic modeling of plant-based griffithsin manufacturing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:102. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00102. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arcalis E, Ibl V, Peters J, Melnik S, Stoger E. The dynamic behavior of storage organelles in developing cereal seeds and its impact on the production of recombinant proteins. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5(439):1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arcalis E, Ibl V, Hilscher J, Rademacher T, Avesani L, Morandini F, et al. Russell-like bodies in plant seeds share common features with prolamin bodies and occur upon recombinant protein production. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:777. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00777. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources