Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247143.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247143. eCollection 2021.

Subjective caregiver burden and anxiety in informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Subjective caregiver burden and anxiety in informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rafael Del-Pino-Casado et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that subjective caregiver burden is an important determinant of clinically significant anxiety in family carers. This meta-analysis aims to synthesise this evidence and investigate the relationship between subjective caregiver burden and anxiety symptoms in informal caregivers. We searched PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO up to January 2020. Combined estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. After screening of 4,312 articles, 74 studies (with 75 independent samples) were included. There was a large, positive association between subjective caregiver burden and anxiety symptoms (r = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.47, 0.54; I2 = 0.0%). No differences were found in subgroup analyses by type of study design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal), sampling, control of confounders or care-recipient characteristics. Subjective caregiver burden is an important risk factor for anxiety in informal caregivers. Targeting subjective caregiver burden could be beneficial in preventing clinically significant anxiety for the increasing number of family carers worldwide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The first author was the chief investigator of two studies meeting inclusion criteria for this review. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no other known conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram (PRISMA).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot of the results of the meta-analysis.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot of the results of the meta-analysis.

References

    1. Sallim AB, Sayampanathan AA, Cuttilan A, Chun-Man Ho R (2015) Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders Among Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer Disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16: 1034–1041. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I (2003) Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 24: 113–119. 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00582-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth DL, Fredman L, Haley WE (2015) Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies. Gerontologist 55: 309–319. 10.1093/geront/gnu177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) Health at a Glance 2019: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) Care needed: Improving the lives of people with dementia. Paris: OECD Publishing.