Scalpel versus electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy
- PMID: 3364865
Scalpel versus electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy
Abstract
Forty nine consecutive mastectomy patients were randomized to one of two groups. Twenty four patients had skin flaps created with the cold scalpel and twenty five with the electrocautery. The two groups were similar with respect to age, stage of disease, size of tumor, and weight. Cautery patients had significantly less operative blood loss when compared with scalpel patients, 352 versus 507 milliliters, respectively, P less than 0.05. No cautery patient required transfusion compared with three transfused scalpel patients, P less than .005. Total postoperative hemovac drainage and hospital stay were not significantly different between the two groups. Although the number of fever days and wound complications were slightly higher in the cautery group, the difference was not statistically significant. The electrocautery may be superior to the scalpel for mastectomy.
Similar articles
-
A comparison between scalpel and electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy.Eur J Surg. 1993 Sep;159(9):457-9. Eur J Surg. 1993. PMID: 8274552 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery.Singapore Med J. 2002 May;43(5):226-8. Singapore Med J. 2002. PMID: 12188072
-
A randomised two-way comparison of mastectomy performed using harmonic scalpel or monopolar diathermy.Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34 Suppl 1:105-12. Coll Antropol. 2010. PMID: 20402305 Clinical Trial.
-
The harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery for parotidectomy: A meta - analysis.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;47(6):915-921. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 10. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30954384
-
Comparison of harmonic scalpel and conventional technique in the surgery for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Cancer. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):348-358. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_306_18. Indian J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30829269
Cited by
-
Comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients.J Breast Cancer. 2011 Mar;14(1):58-63. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.58. Epub 2011 Mar 31. J Breast Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21847396 Free PMC article.
-
Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD005987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005987.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28931203 Free PMC article.
-
Dissection Technique for Abdominoplasty: A Prospective Study on Scalpel versus Diathermocoagulation (Coagulation Mode).Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Feb 6;3(1):e299. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000222. eCollection 2015 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015. PMID: 25674380 Free PMC article.
-
Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].BMC Cancer. 2005 Jan 27;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-11. BMC Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15676064 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of plasmakinetic cautery on wound healing and complications in mastectomy.J Breast Cancer. 2013 Jun;16(2):198-201. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.2.198. Epub 2013 Jun 28. J Breast Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23843853 Free PMC article.