Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;14(5):591-600.
doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00496-1. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

A New Approach to Assessing Children's Interpretation of Severity Qualifiers in a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument-The EQ-5D-Y-5L: Development and Testing

Affiliations

A New Approach to Assessing Children's Interpretation of Severity Qualifiers in a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument-The EQ-5D-Y-5L: Development and Testing

Sarah Derrett et al. Patient. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: The beta EQ-5D-Y-5L is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children aged 8-15 years that is currently under development by the EuroQol Group. The EQ-5D-Y-5L is similar to the EQ-5D-Y but has five levels of severity per dimension rather than three. The increased number of levels increases the granularity of the responses but possibly has also increased the difficulty of distinguishing between levels. The EuroQoL's Version Management Committee (VMC) required a robust method to determine how well children distinguish between the five EQ-5D-Y-5L ordinal severity qualifiers (i.e. 'no problems' through to 'extreme problems'), which are a critical aspect of both health measurement and the valuation of health states.

Objective: This paper describes the development, testing, selection, and piloting of such a method.

Methods: Following a literature review and consultation with the wider VMC and a Language Support Services agency, a range of exercises were developed to assess the ordering and comprehension of the five severity qualifiers. Three exercises were pre-tested with children in Spain and New Zealand. One exercise, preferred and understood by children, was then piloted.

Results: Five children in Spain and 11 in New Zealand tested the three exercises. In both countries, all children found the three exercises easy to understand and complete. Of the 12 children who expressed a preference, nine said they preferred the card ranking. Card ranking also allowed the interviewer to observe difficult choices being made as the children physically rearranged the card order until they settled on their final order. Following rigorous assessment of translatability and cultural portability by an independent Language Support Service, card ranking was piloted in South Africa (n = 9) and in Indonesia (n = 10), where it highlighted severity qualifier order inversions that would otherwise not have been detected.

Conclusion: The card ranking exercise was found to be a preferred and acceptable means of testing the ordering of translations of severity qualifiers among children. Additional formal testing of the exercise in other countries and languages is now underway. The approach developed and tested by the VMC for cognitive debriefing of beta EQ-5D-Y-5L language/country versions may also be useful in determining the adequacy of translated qualifiers in debriefing of adult EQ-5D-5L versions and other PROMs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SD, MH, and JJ are members of the EuroQol Group’s VMC (Netherlands). LGN is a doctoral candidate with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (UK) and the Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (Malawi). EYM is an employee of RWS Life Sciences.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of project stages.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the three games selected for pre-testing in Spain and New Zealand

References

    1. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Educ. 2017;17(4):137–144. doi: 10.1093/bjaed/mkw060. - DOI
    1. Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, Hjollund NH. Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ. 2019;364:k5267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMs: Putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: The King's Fund; 2010.
    1. Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Dalkin S, Wright J, Valderas J, et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2:42. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources