Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate
- PMID: 33650704
- DOI: 10.1002/jor.25017
Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate
Abstract
The purposes of this prospective cohort study were (1) to assess if second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rate 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in those who returned to pivoting sport was associated with meeting (a) quantitative return to sport (RTS) criteria, (b) qualitative RTS criteria, and (c) combined quantitative and qualitative RTS criteria, and (2) to determine why athletes did not return to their preinjury (level of) sport. Athletes after ACLR performed RTS tests immediately before RTS: seven movement quantity (strength and hop test battery) and two movement quality (countermovement jump with LESS score and hop-and-hold test) tests. A 2-year postoperative questionnaire asked for RTS, reasons for not returning to the same (level of) sport and second ACL injuries. One hundred and forty-four athletes (82%) completed the questionnaire and 97 of them returned to a pivoting sport. Seven of these athletes had a second ACL injury. Meeting the hop test battery RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 11%; p = .047) and hop-and-hold test RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 15%; p = .031) were both significantly associated with a reduced second ACL injury rate. Meeting combined RTS criteria were not significantly associated with second ACL injury rate. Therefore, RTS tests after ACLR should at least comprise a hop test battery or the hop-and-hold test to reduce second ACL injury risk after return to pivoting sport. Also, one-third of all athletes mentioned fear of reinjury as the main reason for not returning to their preinjury (level of) sport. This psychological component should be taken seriously and discussed during rehabilitation.
Keywords: RTS criteria; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; return to sport; second ACL injury.
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wiggins AJ , Grandhi RK , Schneider DK , Stanfield D , Webster KE , Myer GD . Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;44:1861-1876.
-
- van Melick N , van Cingel REH , Brooijmans F , et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1506-1515.
-
- Grindem H , Engebretsen L , Axe M , Snyder-Mackler L , Risberg MA . Activity and functional readiness, not age, are the critical factors for second anterior cruciate ligament injury-the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:1099-1102.
-
- Kyritsis P , Bahr R , Landreau P , et al. 2016 Likelihood of ACL graft rupture. Br J Sports Med. 50:946-951
-
- Losciale JM , Zdeb RM , Ledbetter L , Reiman MP , Sell TC . The association between passing return-to-sport criteria and second anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49:43-54.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
