Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Mar 9;5(5):1283-1290.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002690.

End-of-treatment PET/CT predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL after first-line treatment: results from GOYA

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

End-of-treatment PET/CT predicts PFS and OS in DLBCL after first-line treatment: results from GOYA

Lale Kostakoglu et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

GOYA was a randomized phase 3 study comparing obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) vs standard-of-care rituximab plus CHOP in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This retrospective analysis of GOYA aimed to assess the association between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with positron emission tomography (PET)-based complete response (CR) status. Overall, 1418 patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 21-day cycles of obinutuzumab (n = 706) or rituximab (n = 712) plus 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP. Patients received a mandatory fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-PET/computed tomography scan at baseline and end of treatment. After a median follow-up of 29 months, the numbers of independent review committee-assessed PFS and OS events in the entire cohort were 416 (29.3%) and 252 (17.8%), respectively. End-of-treatment PET CR was highly prognostic for PFS and OS according to Lugano 2014 criteria (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.38; P < .0001; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P < .0001), irrespective of international prognostic index score and cell of origin. In conclusion, the results from this prospectively acquired large cohort corroborated previously published data from smaller sample sizes showing that end-of-treatment PET CR is an independent predictor of PFS and OS and a promising prognostic marker in DLBCL. Long-term survival analysis confirmed the robustness of these data over time. Additional meta-analyses including other prospective studies are necessary to support the substitution of PET CR for PFS as an effective and practical surrogate end point. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01287741.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: L.K. reports consultancy for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and Genentech, Inc., and travel, accommodations, or expenses from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. M.M. reports consultancy, advisory board, or speaker’s bureau for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Janssen, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, and Sandoz and travel, accommodations, or expenses from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. D.B. reports research funding from or consulting or advisory role for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen-Cilag. A.P. reports honoraria from or speaker’s bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Janssen, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, and Mundipharma EDO; consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, and Mundipharma EDO; patents, royalties, or other intellectual property from Mundipharma EDO; and travel, accommodations, or expenses from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. L.H.S. reports research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and Genentech, Inc., and consultancy for or honoraria from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Genentech, Inc., AbbVie, Amgen, Apobiologix, Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Karyopharm, Lundbeck, Merck, MorphoSys, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Teva, TG Therapeutics, and Verastem. A.K. is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. D.S. is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. F.M. is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. T.N. is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. G.S. is an employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and reports travel, accommodations, or expenses from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. U.V. reports consulting or advisory role for Janssen, Celgene, Juno Therapeutics, and Kite Pharma; speaker’s bureau for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Janssen, Celgene, Gilead, Servier, and AbbVie; research funding from Celgene; and travel, accommodations, or expenses from Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and AbbVie. M.T. reports honoraria from or consultancy for Janssen, Gilead, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Amgen, AbbVie, Takeda, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, MorphoSys, and Incyte; consultancy for Celgene; and travel, accommodation, or expenses from AbbVie, Gilead, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Takeda, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and Janssen. E.G.-B. reports consultancy for Janssen, Sandoz, and Gilead and speaker’s bureau for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Janssen, and AbbVie. N.C. reports research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and honoraria from or consultancy or advisory board for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, Merck, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Lundbeck. M.Z.O. is a former employee and stockholder of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd, and is an employee and stockholder of Novo Nordisk Healthcare AG. A.-M.C., X.H., Y.S., and Y.T. declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Investigator-assessed survival from end of treatment according to PET CR status assessed by standard Lugano 2014 response criteria (PET ITT population). (A) PFS (n = 1092). (B) OS (n = 1145). Final data cutoff, 31 January 2018. According to standard Lugano 2014 response criteria, no PET CR includes PR, nonresponse, and progressive disease patients with no progressive disease event by primary end point definition (investigator-assessed PFS). P values by log-rank test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of investigator-assessed PFS according to PET CR status for patients with IPI scores of 0 to 2 and 3 to 5 by standard Lugano 2014 criteria (PET ITT population, n = 1092). According to standard Lugano 2014 response criteria, no PET CR includes PR, nonresponse, and progressive disease patients with no progressive disease event by the primary end point definition (investigator-assessed PFS). P values by log-rank test.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of investigator-assessed PFS according to cell of origin for patients with and without PET CR by standard Lugano 2014 criteria (PET ITT population, n = 1092). According to standard Lugano 2014 response criteria, no PET CR includes PR, nonresponse, and progressive disease patients with no progressive disease event by the primary end point definition (investigator-assessed PFS). P values by log-rank test.

References

    1. Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N, et al. Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(27):4184-4190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheson BD. Role of functional imaging in the management of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(14):1844-1854. - PubMed
    1. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. ; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma . Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):579-586. - PubMed
    1. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. ; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute . Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059-3068. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cashen AF, Dehdashti F, Luo J, Homb A, Siegel BA, Bartlett NL. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: poor predictive value of international harmonization project interpretation. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(3):386-392. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data