Interlocutor accommodation of gradually altered nasal signal levels in a model speaker
- PMID: 33651926
- DOI: 10.1515/phon-2019-0105
Interlocutor accommodation of gradually altered nasal signal levels in a model speaker
Abstract
Background: Phonetic accommodation is observed when interacting speakers gradually converge (or diverge) on phonetic features over the course of a conversation. The present experiment investigated whether gradual changes in the nasal signal levels of a pre-recorded model speaker would lead to accommodation in the nasalance scores of the interlocutor in a speech-shadowing experiment.
Methods: Twenty female speakers in two groups repeated sentences after a pre-recorded model speaker whose nasal signal level was gradually increased or decreased over the course of the experiment. Outcome measures were the mean nasalance scores at the initial baseline, maximum nasal signal level, minimum nasal signal level and final baseline conditions. The order of presentation of the maximum and minimum nasal signal levels was varied between the two groups.
Results: The results showed a significant effect of condition in F(3) = 2.86, p = 0.045. Both groups of participants demonstrated lower nasalance scores in response to increased nasal signal levels in the model (phonetic divergence). The group that was first presented with the maximum nasal signal levels demonstrated lower nasalance scores for the minimum nasal signal level condition (phonetic convergence).
Conclusion: Speakers showed a consistent divergent reaction to a more nasal-sounding model speaker, but their response to a less nasal-sounding model may depend on the order of presentation of the manipulations. More research is needed to investigate the effects of increased versus decreased nasality in the speech of an interlocutor.
Keywords: auditory feedback; nasality; phonetic convergence; speech; speech accommodation; speech compensation.
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Babel, Molly. 2010. Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39(04). 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000400.
-
- Babel, Molly. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001.
-
- Bauer, Jay J., Jay Mittal, Charles R. Larson & Timothy C. Hain. 2006. Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119. 2363–2371. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2173513.
-
- Belin, Pascal, Salvatore Campanella & Thomas Ethofer. 2013. Integrating face and voice in person perception. Stuttgart: Springer.
-
- Bench, John, Åse Kowal & John Bamford. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology 13(3). 108–112.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous