Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;20(2):342-352.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.02.035. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

Epidemiologic and Economic Burden of Achalasia in the United States

Affiliations

Epidemiologic and Economic Burden of Achalasia in the United States

Charles E Gaber et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background & aims: Achalasia is a debilitating chronic condition of the esophagus. Currently there are no national estimates on the epidemiologic and economic burden of disease. We sought to estimate trends in incidence and prevalence of achalasia by age-sex strata, and to estimate the total direct medical costs attributed to achalasia in the United States.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study using two administrative claims databases: IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2001-2018; age <65) and a 20% sample of nationwide Medicare enrollment and claims (2007-2015; age ≥65). Point prevalence was calculated on the first day of each calendar year; the incidence rate captured new cases developed in the ensuing year. Utilization rates of healthcare services and procedures were reported. Mean costs per patient were calculated and standardized to the corresponding U.S. Census Bureau population data to derive achalasia-specific total direct medical costs.

Results: The crude prevalence of achalasia per 100,000 persons was 18.0 (95% CI, 17.4, 18.7) in MarketScan and 162.1 (95% CI, 157.6, 166.6) in Medicare. The crude incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was 10.5 (95% CI, 9.9, 11.1) in MarketScan and 26.0 (95% CI, 24.9, 27.2) in Medicare. Incidence and prevalence increased substantially over time in the Medicare cohort, and increased with more advanced age in both cohorts. Utilization of achalasia-specific healthcare was high; national estimates of total direct medical costs exceeded $408 million in 2018.

Conclusions: Achalasia has a higher epidemiologic and economic burden in the US than previously suggested, with diagnosis particularly increasing in older patients.

Keywords: Achalasia; Cost; Epidemiology; Incidence; Prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Equations and study schematics for A) point prevalence and B) incidence rate
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Equations and study schematics for A) point prevalence and B) incidence rate
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Age and sex stratum-specific trends in prevalence and incidence rate of achalasia in privately insured (2001–2018) and Medicare-insured (2008–2015) populations. A) MarketScan prevalence. B) Medicare prevalence. C) MarketScan incidence rate. D) Medicare incidence rate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Age and sex stratum-specific trends in prevalence and incidence rate of achalasia in privately insured (2001–2018) and Medicare-insured (2008–2015) populations. A) MarketScan prevalence. B) Medicare prevalence. C) MarketScan incidence rate. D) Medicare incidence rate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Age and sex stratum-specific trends in prevalence and incidence rate of achalasia in privately insured (2001–2018) and Medicare-insured (2008–2015) populations. A) MarketScan prevalence. B) Medicare prevalence. C) MarketScan incidence rate. D) Medicare incidence rate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Age and sex stratum-specific trends in prevalence and incidence rate of achalasia in privately insured (2001–2018) and Medicare-insured (2008–2015) populations. A) MarketScan prevalence. B) Medicare prevalence. C) MarketScan incidence rate. D) Medicare incidence rate.

References

    1. Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ. Achalasia: A Systematic Review. Jama. 2015;313(18):1841–1852. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.2996 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet Lond Engl. 2013;383(9911):83–93. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60651-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gyawali CP. Achalasia: new perspectives on an old disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(1):4–11. doi:10.1111/nmo.12750 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol H. 2013;11(8):887–897. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nenshi R, Takata J, Stegienko S, et al. The Cost of Achalasia: Quantifying the Effect of Symptomatic Disease on Patient Cost Burden, Treatment Time, and Work Productivity. Surg Innov. 2010;17(4):291–294. doi:10.1177/1553350610376392 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types