Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Feb 26;13(3):760.
doi: 10.3390/nu13030760.

A Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Consuming 100% Orange Juice or Sucrose-Sweetened Beverage on Risk Factors for Cardiometabolic Disease in Women

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Consuming 100% Orange Juice or Sucrose-Sweetened Beverage on Risk Factors for Cardiometabolic Disease in Women

Candice Allister Price et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Overconsumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases risk factors associated with cardiometabolic disease, in part due to hepatic fructose overload. However, it is not clear whether consumption of beverages containing fructose as naturally occurring sugar produces equivalent metabolic dysregulation as beverages containing added sugars. We compared the effects of consuming naturally-sweetened orange juice (OJ) or sucrose-sweetened beverages (sucrose-SB) for two weeks on risk factors for cardiometabolic disease. Healthy, overweight women (n = 20) were assigned to consume either 3 servings of 100% orange juice or sucrose-SB/day. We conducted 16-hour serial blood collections and 3-h oral glucose tolerance tests during a 30-h inpatient visit at baseline and after the 2-week diet intervention. The 16-h area under the curve (AUC) for uric acid increased in subjects consuming sucrose-SB compared with subjects consuming OJ. Unlike sucrose-SB, OJ did not significantly increase fasting or postprandial lipoproteins. Consumption of both beverages resulted in reductions in the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (OJ: -0.40 ± 0.18, p = 0.04 within group; sucrose-SB: -1.0 ± 0.38, p = 0.006 within group; p = 0.53 between groups). Findings from this pilot study suggest that consumption of OJ at levels above the current dietary guidelines for sugar intake does not increase plasma uric acid concentrations compared with sucrose-SB, but appears to lead to comparable decreases of insulin sensitivity.

Keywords: fruit juice; insulin sensitivity; lipids; sugar-sweetened beverage; uric acid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of 2-day inpatient visits. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Uric acid concentrations: Sixteen-hour circulating uric acid concentrations before (black line) and after (orange line, orange juice (OJ); blue line, sucrose-sweetened beverage (sucrose-SB) consumption of either (A) OJ or (B) sucrose-SB for two weeks. Change of 16-h area under the curve (AUC) for (C) uric acid and (D) fasting uric acid in women consuming either naturally-sweetened OJ (orange bars) or sucrose-SB (blue bars) for two weeks. ++ p < 0.01, effect of group. * p < 0.05, LS mean of change different from zero.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes of fasting and late-night postprandial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) in women consuming either naturally-sweetened OJ (orange bars) or sucrose-SB (blue bars) for two weeks. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, LS mean of change different from zero, primary ANCOVA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sixteen-hour circulating triglyceride (TG) concentrations before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (A) OJ or (B) sucrose-SB for two weeks. Changes in fasting and postprandial (C) triglyceride and (D) ApoCIII after two weeks of OJ or sucrose-SB consumption. * p < 0.05, LS mean of change different from zero. Apolipoprotein CIII (ApoCIII).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Metrics of insulin sensitivity measured by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the metabolite, 2-hydroxybutyrate. Glucose curves during the OGTT before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (A) OJ or (B) sucrose-SB for two weeks; Insulin curves during the OGTT before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (C) OJ or (D) sucrose-SB for two weeks; (E) Changes in Matsuda Index; (F) 2-hydroxybutyrate concentrations measured after a 4-h fast. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 LS mean of change different from zero.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Metrics of insulin sensitivity measured by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the metabolite, 2-hydroxybutyrate. Glucose curves during the OGTT before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (A) OJ or (B) sucrose-SB for two weeks; Insulin curves during the OGTT before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (C) OJ or (D) sucrose-SB for two weeks; (E) Changes in Matsuda Index; (F) 2-hydroxybutyrate concentrations measured after a 4-h fast. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 LS mean of change different from zero.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The 16-hour circulating glucose and insulin concentrations before (black line) and after (blue line) consumption of either (A,C) OJ or (B,D) sucrose-SB beverage for two weeks. Plasma was collected during consumption of energy-balanced meals at breakfast, lunch and dinner containing 55% Ereq as complex carbohydrate at baseline and during consumption of energy-balanced baseline diets containing 30% Ereq as complex carbohydrate and 25% as OJ or sucrose-SB at 2 weeks.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 2) plasma ethyl-β-D-glucuronide before (18:00-h) and after (19:00-h and 20:00-h) consumption of an energy-balanced dinner. At baseline, dinner contained 55% Ereq as complex carbohydrate; at intervention, dinner contained 30% Ereq as complex carbohydrate and 25% as OJ or sucrose-SB.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stanhope K.L. Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2016;53:52–67. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1084990. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanhope K.L., Goran M.I., Bosy-Westphal A., King J.C., Schmidt L.A., Schwarz J.-M., Stice E., Sylvetsky A.C., Turnbaugh P.J., Bray G.A., et al. Pathways and mechanisms linking dietary components to cardiometabolic disease: Thinking beyond calories. Obes. Rev. 2018;19:1205–1235. doi: 10.1111/obr.12699. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Softic S., Stanhope K.L., Boucher J., Divanovic S., Lanaspa M.A., Johnson R.J., Kahn C.R. Fructose and hepatic insulin resistance. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2020;57:308–322. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1711360. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanhope K.L., Schwarz J.M., Keim N.L., Griffen S.C., Bremer A.A., Graham J.L., Hatcher B., Cox C.L., Dyachenko A., Zhang W., et al. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2009;119:1322–1334. doi: 10.1172/JCI37385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanhope K.L., Medici V., Bremer A.A., Lee V., Lam H.D., Nunez M.V., Chen G.X., Keim N.L., Havel P.J. A dose-response study of consuming high-fructose corn syrup–sweetened beverages on lipid/lipoprotein risk factors for cardiovascular disease in young adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015;101:1144–1154. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms