Regadenoson Stress Testing: A Comprehensive Review With a Focused Update
- PMID: 33654619
- PMCID: PMC7909893
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12940
Regadenoson Stress Testing: A Comprehensive Review With a Focused Update
Abstract
Regadenoson is a pharmacological stress agent that has been widely used since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. For many years, dipyridamole and adenosine, which are non-selective adenosine receptor agonists, were more popular. However, these agents are less preferred now due to their undesirable adverse effects as compared to regadenoson. In the ADVANCE (ADenoscan Versus regAdenosoN Comparative Evaluation) phase 3 clinical trial, regadenoson demonstrated non-inferiority to adenosine for detecting reversible myocardial ischemia. This review summarizes the clinical utilities of regadenoson as the most widely used pharmacological stress agent. Moreover, the use of regadenoson has been documented in specific patient populations. Although regadenoson has established safety and efficacy in most patients with chronic diseases, there are equivocal results in the literature for other chronic diseases. It is warranted to highlight that the use of regadenoson has not been studied in patients of low socioeconomic class; it is a condition that carries a significant burden on the cardiovascular system.
Keywords: adenosine; cardiac stress test; coronary stenosis; lexiscan; myocardial perfusion imaging; non obstructive coronary artery disease; nuclear stress test; pharmacological stress agents; regadenoson; socio-economic factors.
Copyright © 2021, Elkholy et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Advances in pharmacologic stress agents: focus on regadenoson.J Nucl Med Technol. 2010 Sep;38(3):163-71. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.109.065581. Epub 2010 Aug 19. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010. PMID: 20724531 Review.
-
Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 May;1(3):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.003. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008. PMID: 19356442 Clinical Trial.
-
Myocardial stress perfusion magnetic resonance: initial experience in a pediatric and young adult population using regadenoson.Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Mar;47(3):280-289. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3762-0. Epub 2016 Dec 29. Pediatr Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28035425
-
A rare complication of a common stress test.J Cardiol Cases. 2014 Apr 16;10(2):43-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2014.03.007. eCollection 2014 Aug. J Cardiol Cases. 2014. PMID: 30546501 Free PMC article.
-
Regadenoson: review of its established role in myocardial perfusion imaging and emerging applications.Cardiol Rev. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):42-8. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3182613db6. Cardiol Rev. 2013. PMID: 22643345 Review.
Cited by
-
Splenic switch-off in regadenoson 82Rb-PET myocardial perfusion imaging: assessment of clinical utility.J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;30(4):1484-1496. doi: 10.1007/s12350-022-03158-3. Epub 2023 Jan 6. J Nucl Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36607537
-
Doppler Echocardiography Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 29;8:723542. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.723542. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34778394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Know Your ABCs: Discovery, Differentiation, and Targeting of T-Bet+ B Cells.Immunol Rev. 2025 Mar;330(1):e13440. doi: 10.1111/imr.13440. Immunol Rev. 2025. PMID: 39844597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-Invasive Assessment of Locally Overexpressed Human Adenosine 2A Receptors in the Heart of Transgenic Mice.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 18;23(3):1025. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031025. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35162950 Free PMC article.
-
State of the art of CT myocardial perfusion.Radiol Med. 2025 Mar;130(3):438-452. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01942-4. Epub 2024 Dec 20. Radiol Med. 2025. PMID: 39704963 Review.
References
-
- Current methods of pharmacologic stress testing and the potential advantages of new agents. Botvinick EH. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009;37:14–25. - PubMed
-
- ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:380–406. - PubMed
-
- Exercise stress testing: indications and common questions. Garner KK, Pomeroy W, Arnold JJ. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2017/0901/p293.html. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96:293–299. - PubMed
-
- Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging: integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. Cerqueira MD, Nguyen P & Staehr P. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:307–316. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources