First Analysis of Same-day Pegfilgrastim Use with Concurrent Capecitabine-based Regimens in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies
- PMID: 33655238
- PMCID: PMC7903891
First Analysis of Same-day Pegfilgrastim Use with Concurrent Capecitabine-based Regimens in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Abstract
Background: Pegfilgrastim is administered 24 hours. after chemotherapy to reduce risks of myelosuppression. This requires an additional clinic visit, which can be difficult for some patients (pts) due to work and transportation issues. In GI malignancies, patients receiving capecitabine-based regimens also require pegfilgrastim to reduce myelotoxicity. We present here the first study to analyze safety and efficacy of administering pegfilgrastim on the same day as capecitabine-based regimens in patients with GI malignancies.
Methods: We evaluated 157 patients with GI malignancies who received a capecitabine-based chemotherapy regimen, including XELOX, EOX, ECX, XELIRI, MIXE, gemcitabine-capecitabine and same-day pegfilgrastim (6 mg) within 1 hr of completion of systemic agents. As per institutional guidelines, patients were counseled on risks of same-day pegfilgrastim prior to its administration. Patients were followed to determine the degree of neutropenia and toxicity.
Results: A total of 914 chemotherapy cycles in 157 patients were analyzed. Median ANC nadir for all cycles was 5634/uL (range: 450 - 23800). Grade 1 and 2 neutropenia developed in 11 of 914 cycles. Bone pain reported in 9 pts. There was 1 episode of grade >3 neutropenia resulting in infection and antibiotic use. No other patient required dose reductions, chemotherapy delays, or hospitalizations. No increased toxicity of capecitabine was noticed.
Conclusions: We believe our study is the first in GI malignancies to report that same-day pegfilgrastim administration with capecitabine-based regimens may be as effective and safe as next-day administration. Additionally, given the absence of CD in human bone marrow, it appears capecitabine can be used concurrently with pegfilgrastim. Prospective studies should be done to further investigate, as this practice can benefit patients clinically, decrease office visits, increase patient's satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.
Keywords: Capecitabine; Chemotherapy; Fever; Leukopenia; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Side effects.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Safety and Efficacy of Same-Day Administration of Pegfilgrastim in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.Cancer Med J. 2021 Apr 1;4(1):6-11. Epub 2020 May 18. Cancer Med J. 2021. PMID: 32656544 Free PMC article.
-
The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Mar;112(3):601-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 24. Gynecol Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19110303
-
Safety and Efficacy of Pegfilgrastim When Given Less Than 14 Days Before the Next Chemotherapy Cycle: Review of Every 14-Day Chemotherapy Regimen Containing 5-FU Continuous Infusion.Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Oct;51(10):840-847. doi: 10.1177/1060028017714554. Epub 2017 Jun 9. Ann Pharmacother. 2017. PMID: 28597691
-
Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.BMC Cancer. 2021 May 27;21(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08258-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34044798 Free PMC article.
-
Use of prophylactic pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in the US: A review of adherence to present guidelines for usage.Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;29:100466. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100466. Epub 2021 Sep 25. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021. PMID: 34655862 Review.
Cited by
-
Irregular delay of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with poor outcome in stage II-III colorectal cancer.BMC Cancer. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09767-y. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35715761 Free PMC article.
-
The travails of therapeutic modifications in cancer care amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Future directions and lessons learned.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun;66:102411. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102411. Epub 2021 May 29. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021. PMID: 34094529 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, et al. (2006) Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 106(10): 2258–2266. - PubMed
-
- Bhana N (2007) Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: Evidence based review. Current Opinion in Oncology 19(4): 328–335. - PubMed
-
- Meropol NJ, Miller LL, Korn EL, et al. (1992) Severed myelosuppression resulting from concurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cytotoxic chemotherapy. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 84(15): 1201–1203. - PubMed
-
- Saif MW, Kaley K, Brennan M, et al. (2013) A retrospective study of capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) after failing previous therapy. Journal of the Pancreas 14(5): 498–501. - PubMed
-
- Saif MW, Kaley K, Brennan M, et al. (2013) Mitomycin-C and capecitabine (MIXE) as salvage treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective study. Anticancer Research 33(6): 2743–2746. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials