Strategies Used to Support Peer Provision in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 33655461
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-021-01118-6
Strategies Used to Support Peer Provision in Mental Health: A Scoping Review
Abstract
The employment of peer providers (people who draw on their lived experience of mental health challenges) has grown in conjunction with the increased acceptance of recovery as a key principle in mental health policy and practice. Barriers to the integration of peer providers in mental health services have been well documented. This review addresses an under-explored area by consolidating strategies undertaken by mental health organizations for the successful implementation of peer provision. A scoping review was chosen to facilitate the rapid summary and dissemination of research findings that are relevant to policymakers and practitioners. Peer-reviewed articles and grey literature were sourced from three databases, key peer support websites and a hand search of the included studies. Following screening, data were extracted from 28 studies: 25 qualitative and three mixed methods studies. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis and organized into themes. Four themes emerged from the data. Championing of peer provision initiatives by organizational leadership is central to the success and sustainability of peer provision. Leadership undergirds three strategies that were discussed: organizational preparation, recruitment, training and induction, and support and development. When peer provision is championed by organizational leadership, measures can be undertaken to prepare the organization for peer provision; recruit, train and induce peer providers successfully into the organization; and support peer providers on the job.
Keywords: Leadership; Organization; Peer provision; Recovery; Scoping review.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
-
- Bates, A., & Kemp, V. (2008). Report on Healthright peer advocacy and support service trial 2007. Healthright. http://www.healthright.org.au/download.cfm?DownloadFile=314AF331-96BA-5D...
-
- Bellamy, C., Schmutte, T., & Davidson, L. (2017). An update on the growing evidence base for peer support. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 21(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-03-2017-0014 . - DOI
-
- Berry, C., Hayward, M. I., & Chandler, R. (2011). Another rather than other: Experiences of peer support specialist workers and their managers working in mental health services. Journal of Public Mental Health, 10(4), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465721111188269 . - DOI
-
- Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jmmss_v6i1_blair . - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
