Low pre-stimulus EEG alpha power amplifies visual awareness but not visual sensitivity
- PMID: 33655566
- DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15166
Low pre-stimulus EEG alpha power amplifies visual awareness but not visual sensitivity
Abstract
Pre-stimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to the level of awareness of sensory stimuli. More specifically, the power of low-frequency oscillations (primarily in the alpha-band, i.e., 8-14 Hz) prior to stimulus onset is inversely related to measures of subjective performance in visual tasks, such as confidence and visual awareness. Intriguingly, the same EEG signature does not seem to influence objective measures of task performance (i.e., accuracy). We here examined whether this dissociation holds when stringent accuracy measures are used. Previous EEG-studies have employed 2-alternative forced choice (2-AFC) discrimination tasks to link pre-stimulus oscillatory activity to correct/incorrect responses as an index of accuracy/objective performance at the single-trial level. However, 2-AFC tasks do not provide a good estimate of single-trial accuracy, as many of the responses classified as correct will be contaminated by guesses (with the chance correct response rate being 50%). Here instead, we employed a 19-AFC letter identification task to measure accuracy and the subjectively reported level of perceptual awareness on each trial. As the correct guess rate is negligible (~5%), this task provides a purer measure of accuracy. Our results replicate the inverse relationship between pre-stimulus alpha/beta-band power and perceptual awareness ratings in the absence of a link to discrimination accuracy. Pre-stimulus oscillatory phase did not predict either subjective awareness or accuracy. Our results hence confirm a dissociation of the pre-stimulus EEG power-task performance link for subjective versus objective measures of performance, and further substantiate pre-stimulus alpha power as a neural predictor of visual awareness.
Keywords: EEG; alpha; oscillations; perceptual awareness.
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Antonov, P. A., Chakravarthi, R., & Andersen, S. K. (2020). Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention. NeuroImage, 219, 117006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117006
-
- Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
-
- Benwell, C. S. Y., Keitel, C., Harvey, M., Gross, J., & Thut, G. (2018). Trial-by-trial co-variation of pre-stimulus EEG alpha power and visuospatial bias reflects a mixture of stochastic and deterministic effects. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48, 2566-2584.
-
- Benwell, C. S. Y., Tagliabue, C. F., Veniero, D., Cecere, R., Savazzi, S., & Thut, G. (2017). Prestimulus EEG power predicts conscious awareness but not objective visual performance. Eneuro, 4, ENEURO.0182-17.2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017
-
- Bonnefond, M., Kastner, S., & Jensen, O. (2017). Communication between brain areas based on nested oscillations. Eneuro, 4, ENEURO.0153-16.2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0153-16.2017
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials