Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 15:8:625016.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.625016. eCollection 2021.

Development and Application of Endothelial Cells Derived From Pluripotent Stem Cells in Microphysiological Systems Models

Affiliations
Review

Development and Application of Endothelial Cells Derived From Pluripotent Stem Cells in Microphysiological Systems Models

Crystal C Kennedy et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

The vascular endothelium is present in all organs and blood vessels, facilitates the exchange of nutrients and waste throughout different organ systems in the body, and sets the tone for healthy vessel function. Mechanosensitive in nature, the endothelium responds to the magnitude and temporal waveform of shear stress in the vessels. Endothelial dysfunction can lead to atherosclerosis and other diseases. Modeling endothelial function and dysfunction in organ systems in vitro, such as the blood-brain barrier and tissue-engineered blood vessels, requires sourcing endothelial cells (ECs) for these biomedical engineering applications. It can be difficult to source primary, easily renewable ECs that possess the function or dysfunction in question. In contrast, human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can be sourced from donors of interest and renewed almost indefinitely. In this review, we highlight how knowledge of vascular EC development in vivo is used to differentiate induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) into ECs. We then describe how iPSC-derived ECs are being used currently in in vitro models of organ function and disease and in vivo applications.

Keywords: cell differentiation; induced pluripotent stem cells; organoids; vascular endothelium; vascular tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of some important factors and pathways in EC development. Wnt signaling is necessary for specification of mesoderm and proper function in arterial ECs. FGF2, BMP4, and ETV2 are crucial for mesoderm formation and EC specification. VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling further specifies EC fate, with high and low concentrations leading to arterial or venous EC specificity, respectively. VEGF signaling continues to mediates downstream pathways and receptors that further direct arterial or venous EC specificity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Current methods of iPSC culture and differentiation. Somatic cells are reprogrammed to iPSCs using 4 factors (Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4). iPSCs can be cultured as a monolayer or as 3D embryoid bodies. Endothelial differentiation can be achieved through the addition of small molecules to promote mesoderm then endothelial specification, or through genetic transcriptional activation or exogenous addition of ETV2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Monolayer method of EC differentiation from iPSCs using small molecules. iPSCs transition to lateral mesoderm through addition of CHIR99021, BMP4, and FGF2 for 3 days. Endothelial specification is induced for 3 to 5 days using VEGF-A, SB431542, and forskolin. Sorting for CD144+ and CD31+ cells generates a pure differentiated EC population.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Applications of iPSC-derived ECs. Patient somatic cells are reprogrammed to iPSCs. For genetic diseases, gene editing can be used to correct genetic mutations. ECs differentiated from iPSCs can be used for disease modeling, cell therapies, drug screening, and vascular grafts.

References

    1. Yuan SY, Rigor RR. Regulation of Endothelial Barrier Function. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Life Sciences; (2011). - PubMed
    1. Augustin HG, Koh GY. Organotypic vasculature: from descriptive heterogeneity to functional pathophysiology. Science. (2017) 357: eaal2379. 10.1126/science.aal2379 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marcelo KL, Goldie LC, Hirschi KK. Regulation of endothelial cell differentiation and specification. Circ Res. (2013) 112:1272–87. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hosoya T, Maruyama A, Kang MI, Kawatani Y, Shibata T, Uchida K, et al. . Differential responses of the Nrf2-Keap1 system to laminar and oscillatory shear stresses in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. (2005) 280:27244–50. 10.1074/jbc.M502551200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gimbrone MA, Jr, Garcia-Cardena G. Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2016) 118:620–36. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources