Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;191(1):469-473.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02580-9. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Medical students' attitudes towards the teaching of cervical and ovarian cancer screening protocols in Ireland: a qualitative study

Paul McHugh  1 , Donal Brennan  2   3 , Mary F Higgins  4
Affiliations

Medical students' attitudes towards the teaching of cervical and ovarian cancer screening protocols in Ireland: a qualitative study

Paul McHugh et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Screening programmes decrease the incidence of colorectal, breast and cervical cancer. As such, it is imperative that medical health professionals are educated on the screening programmes available and are aware of the research basis justifying them.

Aims: To establish the attitudes of final-year medical students to a gynaecological cancer screening teaching session, provided as part of their core Obstetrics and Gynaecology module.

Methods: A 3-h workshop, aimed to critically appraise research papers, reviewed cervical and ovarian cancer screening methods. The workshop was facilitated by a Consultant in Gynae-oncology Surgery. Anonymous evaluation was requested from two hundred nine students attending during the 2018/2019 academic year. Qualitative research with thematic analysis of content was performed.

Results: One hundred fifty-six students gave evaluation on the workshop itself (74.6%). Three main themes were identified-support for the importance of teaching screening methods, appreciation of the importance of understanding cervical screening and a wish for further teaching in Critical Appraisal. Students identified that there was a need to understand screening, that it was "..important for us to consider the value of screening programmes". The teaching on Cervical screening was "..helpful, especially with cervical screening".

Conclusions: Medical students expressed a wish to understand the research basis of a common clinical screening programme (for cervical cancer) as well as the research basis for not providing screening to low risk populations (for ovarian cancer). Further research in this area may include exploring how this is taught in other medical schools.

Keywords: Cancer; Education; Medical Student; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bray FFJ, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinn MBP, Jones J, Allen E (1999) Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ 318:904–908 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Grossman DCCS, Owens DK, Barry MJ et al (2018) Screening for ovarian cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 319:588–594 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A et al (2016) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10022):945–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01224-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R (2013) Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-35 - DOI - PubMed - PMC