Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law
- PMID: 33660921
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29592
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from a single angiographic view in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.
Background: Computation of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) from a single angiographic view might increase the feasibility of routine use of computational FFR. In addition, current QFR solutions assume a linear tapering of the reference vessel size, which might decrease the diagnostic accuracy in the presence of the physiologically significant bifurcation lesions.
Methods: An artificial intelligence algorithm was proposed for automatic delineation of lumen contours of major epicardial coronary arteries including their side branches. A step-down reference diameter function was reconstructed based on the Murray bifurcation fractal law and used for QFR computation. Validation of this Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) was performed on the FAVOR II China study population. The μQFR was computed separately in two angiographic projections, starting with the one with optimal angiographic image quality. Hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was defined by pressure wire-derived FFR ≤0.80.
Results: The μQFR was successfully computed in all 330 vessels of 306 patients. There was excellent correlation (r = 0.90, p < .001) and agreement (mean difference = 0.00 ± 0.05, p = .378) between μQFR and FFR. The vessel-level diagnostic accuracy for μQFR to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis was 93.0% (95% CI: 90.3 to 95.8%), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 87.5% (95% CI: 80.2 to 92.8%), 96.2% (95% CI: 92.6 to 98.3%), 92.9% (95% CI: 86.5 to 96.9%), 93.1% (95% CI: 88.9 to 96.1%), 23.0 (95% CI: 11.6 to 45.5), 0.13 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.20), respectively. Use of suboptimal angiographic image view slightly decreased the diagnostic accuracy of μQFR (AUC = 0.97 versus 0.92, difference = 0.05, p < .001). Intra- and inter-observer variability for μQFR computation was 0.00 ± 0.03, and 0.00 ± 0.03, respectively. Average analysis time for μQFR was 67 ± 22 s.
Conclusions: Computation of μQFR from a single angiographic view has high feasibility and excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. The short analysis time and good reproducibility of μQFR bear potential of wider adoption of physiological assessment in the catheterization laboratory.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve; quantitative flow ratio.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 Nov-Dec;16(6):509-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.06.002. Epub 2022 Jun 30. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022. PMID: 35811245
-
Quantitative Flow Ratio Based on Murray Fractal Law: Accuracy of Single Versus Two Angiographic Views.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 26;1(5):100399. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100399. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022. PMID: 39131462 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Derived Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio (μQFR) Versus Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Moderate to Severe Calcified Coronary Lesions-The DIAMOND Study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):377-383. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31553. Epub 2025 Apr 24. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40269637 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive imaging software to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(56):1-230. doi: 10.3310/hta25560. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34588097
-
Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):693-701. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28283. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 30963676
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Performance of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Modulated Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Coronary Stenosis.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 May 31;2(5):101043. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101043. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023. PMID: 39132390 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement between Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) and three-dimensional quantitative flow ratio (3D-QFR) in non-selected angiographic stenosis: A multicenter study.Cardiol J. 2022;29(3):388-395. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0030. Epub 2022 May 17. Cardiol J. 2022. PMID: 35578755 Free PMC article.
-
Angio-based coronary functional assessment predicts 30-day new-onset heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;10(5):2914-2926. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14452. Epub 2023 Jul 16. ESC Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 37455355 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The association between O2-pulse slope ratio and functional severity of coronary stenosis: A combined cardiopulmonary exercise testing and quantitative flow ratio study.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Apr 13;52:101409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101409. eCollection 2024 Jun. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024. PMID: 38646188 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio for onsite assessment of coronary lesions.EuroIntervention. 2024 Oct 21;20(20):e1288-e1297. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00336. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 39432253
References
REFERENCES
-
- Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the task force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-477.
-
- Götberg M, Cook CM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Escaned J, Davies JE. The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1379-1402.
-
- Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Fineschi M, et al. Evolving routine standards in invasive hemodynamic assessment of coronary stenosis: the nationwide Italian SICI-GISE cross-sectional ERIS study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2018;11:1482-1491.
-
- Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the international multicenter FAVOR pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9:2024-2035.
-
- Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, et al. Validation study of image-based fractional flow reserve during coronary angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005259.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical