Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 1;29(2):156-160.
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000705.

Bioengineering for head and neck reconstruction: the role of customized flaps

Tommaso Gualtieri  1   2   3 , Stefano Taboni  3   4   5 , Marco Ferrari  3   4   6 , Ralph Gilbert  2
Affiliations
Review

Bioengineering for head and neck reconstruction: the role of customized flaps

Tommaso Gualtieri et al. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with an overview of the present and future applications of bioengineering for head and neck reconstruction, ranging from the application of Computed Assisted Surgery (CAS) to the most recent advances in 3D printing and tissue engineering.

Recent findings: The use of CAS in head and neck reconstruction has been demonstrated to provide shorter surgical times, improved reconstructive accuracy of bone reconstruction, and achieves better alignment of bone segments in osteotomized reconstructions. Beyond its classical application in bone reconstructions, CAS has demonstrated reliability in the planning and harvesting of soft tissue flaps. To date, literature regarding bioengineering for head and neck reconstruction is mainly focused on in-vitro and animal model experiments; however, some pioneering reports on human patients suggest the potential feasibility of this technology.

Summary: Bioengineering is anticipated to play a key role in the future development of customized flaps for head and neck reconstruction. These technologies are particularly appealing as a new technology to address certain unsolved challenges in head and neck reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Liu J, Shi Q, Yang S, et al. Does postoperative anticoagulation therapy lead to a higher success rate for microvascular free-tissue transfer in the head and neck? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34:87–94.
    1. Kruse ALD, Luebbers HT, Grätz KW, Obwegeser JA. Factors influencing survival of free-flap in reconstruction for cancer of the head and neck: a literature review. Microsurgery 2010; 30:242–248.
    1. Varvares MA, Lin D, Hadlock T, et al. Success of multiple, sequential, free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2005; 115:101–104.
    1. Tarsitano A, Ciocca L, Scotti R, Marchetti C. Morphological results of customized microvascular mandibular reconstruction: a comparative study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:697–702.
    1. Chang EI, Jenkins MP, Patel SA, Topham NS. Long-term operative outcomes of preoperative computed tomography-guided virtual surgical planning for osteocutaneous free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137:619–623.

LinkOut - more resources