Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5221.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84692-x.

Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection

Affiliations

Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection

Jan Hubert et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty (RA) is a well-established surgical procedure in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), whereby a higher failure rate of final hip geometry restoration due to tissue contraction is controversially discussed. The aim was to evaluate radiographic changes of hip geometry parameters during PJI treatment and to determine the impact of the intermediate RA on the final joint restoration after reimplantation of a total hip arthroplasty (reTHA). Radiographic parameters (leg length (LL), femoral offset (FO), horizontal/vertical acetabular center of rotation distance (h/vCORD)) of 47 patients (mean age: 64.1 years) were measured on standard radiographs of the pelvis and compared between four different stages during PJI treatment (pre-replacement status (preTHA), primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), RA and reTHA). The RA duration (mean: 10.9 months) and the number of reoperations during this period (mean: n = 2.0) as well as their impact on hip geometry restoration were evaluated. Between preTHA and pTHA/reTHA an equivalent restoration was measured regarding the FO (p < 0.001/p < 0.001) and hCORD (p = 0.016/p < 0.001), but not regarding the LL and vCORD. In contrast, analysis revealed no influence of RA and an equivalent reconstruction of LL (p = 0.003), FO (p < 0.001), v/hCORD (p = 0.039/p = 0.035) at reTHA compared to pTHA. Furthermore, RA duration (p = 0.053) and the number of reoperations after RA (p = 0.134) had no impact on radiographic hip geometry restoration. The two-stage exchange with intermediate RA does not alter the preexisting hip joint parameters, whereby a good restoration of the final hip geometry, independent of the duration or the number of reoperations, can be achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized radiographs of the pelvis demonstrating the technique for measurement of the different radiographic parameters (leg length (LL), femoral offset (FO), horizontal and vertical acetabular center of rotation distance (hCORD, vCORD)) during PJI treatment [in mm]. LL (blue line) was measured as the length between the interteardrop line and the lesser trochanter. FO (yellow line) was measured as the length between the teardrop and the lesser trochanter. The vCORD and hCORD (red lines) were measured as the length between the teardrop and the center of rotation (COR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots showing changes of the radiographic parameters (LL leg length FO femoral offset h/vCORD horizontal/vertical center of rotation distance) [mean difference in mm] of the hip geometry at different stages during PJI treatment (preTHA pre-replacement status pTHA primary total hip arthroplasty reTHA reimplantation of THA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:1645–1654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurtz SM, et al. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J. Arthroplasty. 2008;23:984–991. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2008;466:1710–1715. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0209-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merollini KM, Crawford RW, Whitehouse SL, Graves N. Surgical site infection prevention following total hip arthroplasty in Australia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2013;41:803–809. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.11.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozic KJ, et al. Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005;87:570–576. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02121. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms