Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12:36:100730.
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100730. eCollection 2021 May.

Can we safely forgo hysterectomy in non-fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors?

Affiliations

Can we safely forgo hysterectomy in non-fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors?

Breana L Hill et al. Gynecol Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Forgoing hysterectomy as part of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) staging is considered appropriate for fertility preservation. We evaluated whether forgoing hysterectomy may also be acceptable in non-fertility-sparing surgery by evaluating the frequency of uterine involvement and the rate of recurrence involving the uterus. A review of all BOTs at one institution over ten years (2009-2019) was performed. Patients with hysterectomy prior to BOT diagnosis were excluded. Data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Bivariate statistics were used to compare groups. 129 patients with BOT on final pathology were identified. 67 cases included hysterectomy. Reasons for no hysterectomy (n = 62) included fertility preservation (40), benign intraoperative frozen pathology (4), patient preference (3), comorbidities (7), and unknown (8). Four of 67 (6.0%) uterine specimens had non-invasive serosal implants, of which two had grossly visible uterine involvement and all four had grossly visible extrauterine peritoneal disease. 12 of 129 (9.3%) patients had documented recurrence, of which all had uterine preservation at the time of initial surgery. Of the 12 recurrences with uterus in situ, none were documented to involve the uterus, and all were composed of non-invasive implants. In patients with BOT grossly confined to ovaries at the time of surgery, we found no cases of uterine involvement. We found no cases in which microscopic uterine serosal involvement changed stage and no cases of recurrence involving the uterus. Hysterectomy may be able to be safely excluded from non-fertility-sparing surgery for BOTs, particularly when disease is grossly confined to the ovaries.

Keywords: Borderline ovarian tumors; Hysterectomy; Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Charts reviewed (separate file).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Silverberg, S.G., B.D., Kurman, R.J., Seidman, J.D., 2004. Prat J, Ronnett BM et al., Borderline ovarian tumors: key points and workshop summary. Hum Pathol., 35, 8, 910–917. - PubMed
    1. Kurman, R.J., S.I., 2000. Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators. Hum Pathol. 31, 5, 539–557. - PubMed
    1. Hauptmann S. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria. Virchows Archiv. 2017;470(2):125–142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. du Bois, A., T.F., Mahner, S., Heitz, F., Harter, P., 2016. Management of borderline ovarian tumors. Ann. Oncol. 20–22. - PubMed
    1. Matsuo, K., M.H., Takiuchi, T., et al., 2017. Role of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of early-stage borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecologic Oncol., 144, 3, 496–502. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources