Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 20;7(2):e06312.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06312. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Disseminating knowledge: A discourse analysis of terrorism in TED talks

Sadiq Altamimi  1
Affiliations

Disseminating knowledge: A discourse analysis of terrorism in TED talks

Sadiq Altamimi. Heliyon. .

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the linguistic mechanism of disseminating knowledge about terrorism by professionals to laypersons in TED Talks. The study examines the interface between knowledge, meaning and social practices in terms of text and context when speakers cognitively reconceptualize terrorism discourse as a professional practice and maintain their stance over social issues. Drawing on a multidisciplinary approach of discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, the study sets out to analyse the discursive representation of terrorism in TED talks delivered between 2002 and 2019, focusing on explanation strategies of definition, description, denomination and metaphor. The results revealed that TED talks' discourse was a less popularised genre regarding terrorism, marked by specialised terms of traditional right discourse of military actions, and impersonal reference for private intentions of building up expert identity.

Keywords: Corpus linguistics; Discourse analysis; Popularization discourse; TED Talks; Terrorism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concordance lines of terror∗.
Figure 2
Figure 2
‘and/or’ and ‘verbs with terrorism as object’ collocates of terrorism.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Achugar M. John Benjamins Publishing Company; Amsterdam: 2008. What We Remember: the Construction of Memory in Military Discourse.
    1. Allen W. Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. 2006. Australian political discourse: pronominal choice in campaign speeches.http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:12794/ALLEN_W_ALS2006.pdf
    1. Altamimi S. forthcoming. The discursive formulation of Brexit: decision, opportunity and needful agreement. Discourse interact. 2021;14(1)
    1. Anesa P., Fage-Butler A. Popularizing biomedical information on an online health forum. Iberica. 2015;29:105–128.
    1. Asad T. Thinking about terrorism and just war. Camb. Rev. Int. Aff. 2010;23(1):3–24.

LinkOut - more resources