Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 16;2(2):100203.
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100203.

A standard calculation methodology for human doubly labeled water studies

John R Speakman  1   2   3   4 Yosuke Yamada  5   6 Hiroyuki Sagayama  7 Elena S F Berman  8 Philip N Ainslie  9 Lene F Andersen  10 Liam J Anderson  9   11 Lenore Arab  12 Issaad Baddou  13 Kweku Bedu-Addo  14 Ellen E Blaak  15 Stephane Blanc  16   17 Alberto G Bonomi  18 Carlijn V C Bouten  19 Pascal Bovet  20 Maciej S Buchowski  21 Nancy F Butte  22 Stefan G J A Camps  15 Graeme L Close  9 Jamie A Cooper  16 Seth A Creasy  23 Sai Krupa Das  24 Richard Cooper  25 Lara R Dugas  25 Cara B Ebbeling  26 Ulf Ekelund  27 Sonja Entringer  28   29 Terrence Forrester  30 Barry W Fudge  31 Annelies H Goris  15 Michael Gurven  32 Catherine Hambly  2 Asmaa El Hamdouchi  13 Marije B Hoos  15 Sumei Hu  3 Noorjehan Joonas  33 Annemiek M Joosen  15 Peter Katzmarzyk  34 Kitty P Kempen  15 Misaka Kimura  6 William E Kraus  35 Robert F Kushner  36 Estelle V Lambert  37 William R Leonard  38 Nader Lessan  39 David S Ludwig  26 Corby K Martin  34 Anine C Medin  10   40 Erwin P Meijer  15 James C Morehen  9   41 James P Morton  9 Marian L Neuhouser  42 Theresa A Nicklas  22 Robert M Ojiambo  43   44 Kirsi H Pietiläinen  45 Yannis P Pitsiladis  46 Jacob Plange-Rhule  14 Guy Plasqui  47 Ross L Prentice  42 Roberto A Rabinovich  48 Susan B Racette  24 David A Raichlen  49 Eric Ravussin  34 Rebecca M Reynolds  50 Susan B Roberts  24 Albertine J Schuit  51 Anders M Sjödin  52 Eric Stice  53 Samuel S Urlacher  54 Giulio Valenti  15 Ludo M Van Etten  15 Edgar A Van Mil  55 Jonathan C K Wells  56 George Wilson  9 Brian M Wood  57   58 Jack Yanovski  59 Tsukasa Yoshida  5 Xueying Zhang  1   2 Alexia J Murphy-Alford  60 Cornelia U Loechl  60 Edward L Melanson  23   61   62 Amy H Luke  63 Herman Pontzer  64   65 Jennifer Rood  34 Dale A Schoeller  66 Klaas R Westerterp  67 William W Wong  22 IAEA DLW database group
Affiliations

A standard calculation methodology for human doubly labeled water studies

John R Speakman et al. Cell Rep Med. .

Abstract

The doubly labeled water (DLW) method measures total energy expenditure (TEE) in free-living subjects. Several equations are used to convert isotopic data into TEE. Using the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) DLW database (5,756 measurements of adults and children), we show considerable variability is introduced by different equations. The estimated rCO2 is sensitive to the dilution space ratio (DSR) of the two isotopes. Based on performance in validation studies, we propose a new equation based on a new estimate of the mean DSR. The DSR is lower at low body masses (<10 kg). Using data for 1,021 babies and infants, we show that the DSR varies non-linearly with body mass between 0 and 10 kg. Using this relationship to predict DSR from weight provides an equation for rCO2 over this size range that agrees well with indirect calorimetry (average difference 0.64%; SD = 12.2%). We propose adoption of these equations in future studies.

Keywords: doubly labeled water; free-living; total energy expenditure; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of published CO2 production by doubly labeled water to that by standard method (A) Relationship between CO2 production (L/d) for 5,756 individuals extracted from the original studies and the recalculated estimates using Equation 1. (B–D) Bland-Altman plots comparing the published rCO2 for studies using (B) the Coward and Prentice equation, (C) the Schoeller et al. A6 equation, and (D) the Racette et al. compared with the standard Equation 1 derived from Sagayama et al. In all plots, dotted line is average difference, and solid blue lines are plus and minus 2 SDs. The red lines define the boundary for plus and minus 10% difference between methods. Data refer to 5,756 adult individuals uploaded into the IAEA DLW database (v3.1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of published energy expenditure by DLW to that calculated by standard method (A) Relationship between the TEE (MJ/d) for 4,571 individual adults extracted from the original studies and the recalculated TEE using the Weir equation. (B) Bland-Altman plot comparing the published TEE with those generated using the recommended equation. Dotted line is average difference. Data refer to data for 4,571 adult individuals uploaded into the IAEA DLW database (v3.1). The sample size is lower than in Figure 1, because for some individuals, estimates of RQ or FQ were not available.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dilution space ratio as a function of body mass and performance of new equation against indirect calorimetry (A) Dilution space ratios (the hydrogen dilution space Nd divided by the oxygen dilution space No) of 332 babies weighing <10 kg from the IAEA DLW database v 3.1 (open circles) combined with data from validation studies in preterm and full-term babies (gray circles). For the sample from the database, there was a linear relationship (blue dotted line that marginally failed to reach significance p = 0.08). We fitted an asymptotic exponential to the combined dataset (red line; r2 = 6.4%; p < 0.03). (B) The results of validation studies of the DLW method in babies comparing the DLW estimates of CO2 production (rCO2) derived from a combination of Equations 9 and 10 presented here and rCO2 measured by indirect calorimetry. There was a strong linear relationship fitted by least-squares regression—dotted blue line, with r2 = 0.90.

References

    1. Lifson N., Gordon G.B., McCLINTOCK R. Measurement of total carbon dioxide production by means of D2O18. J. Appl. Physiol. 1955;7:704–710. - PubMed
    1. Lifson N. Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. J. Theor. Biol. 1966;12:46–74. - PubMed
    1. Speakman J.R. Chapman and Hall; 1997. Doubly Labelled Water: Theory and Practice.
    1. Nagy K.A. Laboratory of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of California; 1983. The Doubly Labeled Water (3HH18O) Method: A Guide to Its Use.
    1. Schoeller D.A., van Santen E. Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method. J. Appl. Physiol. 1982;53:955–959. - PubMed

Publication types