Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;62(3):698-708.
doi: 10.1111/epi.16821.

Perampanel and pregnancy

Affiliations

Perampanel and pregnancy

Blanca Vazquez et al. Epilepsia. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to summarize pregnancy and fetal/postnatal outcomes following maternal perampanel exposure using preclinical and clinical data, and to use physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to improve understanding of perampanel pharmacokinetics (PK) during pregnancy.

Methods: Preclinical developmental studies with perampanel were conducted in pregnant rats and rabbits. Clinical data were collated from the Eisai global perampanel safety database, comprising reports of perampanel exposure during pregnancy from routine clinical settings, interventional studies, and non-interventional post-marketing studies, searched for events coded to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) high-level group terms of Pregnancy, Labor, Delivery, and Postpartum Conditions and/or the Standardized MedDRA Query terms of Congenital, Familiar, and Genetic Disorders. A PBPK model was used to predict clinical perampanel PK throughout pregnancy.

Results: Preclinical studies indicated that perampanel may be linked with post-implantation loss and/or some specific physical development delays but not fertility and early embryonic development. As of August 31, 2018, 96 pregnancies in 90 women receiving perampanel had been reported. No concomitant medications were reported in 26 (28.9%) women taking perampanel. Overall, 43 pregnancies reached full term (all normal live births), 28 did not reach term (induced abortion, n = 18; spontaneous miscarriage, n = 6; incomplete spontaneous miscarriage, n = 2; premature delivery, n = 1; stillbirth [Fallot's tetralogy], n = 1), 18 were lost to follow-up, and seven were ongoing at data cut-off. Adverse events were reported in five full-term neonates (low Apgar score, n = 2; fatal neonatal aspiration, n = 1; cystic fibrosis and congenital deafness, n = 1; poor sucking reflex and shallow breathing, n = 1). PK simulations predicted perampanel exposure decreases throughout pregnancy and is up to four- and three-fold lower towards the end of pregnancy compared with non-pregnant women for total and unbound perampanel, respectively.

Significance: These data provide preliminary information on perampanel use during pregnancy and should be interpreted with caution. Further outcome data are required to estimate the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes with perampanel exposure.

Keywords: adverse events; epilepsy; perampanel; physiologically based pharmacokinetics; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.V. has received research support from Biogen MA Inc., Cavion LLC, Engage Therapeutics Inc., Neurelis, Ovid Therapeutics, SK Life Science Inc., UCB Biopharma SPRL, and UCB Biosciences Inc. T.T. has received speaker's honoraria to his institution from Eisai, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, and UCB, and research support from Bial, CURE, Eisai, the European Union (ESBACE), GlaxoSmithKline, Stockholm County Council, Teva, and UCB. C.D. and E.S. are employees of Eisai Inc. T.J.O. has received research and speaker honoraria from Eisai and UCB Pharma.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Single oral dose simulations of perampanel 8 mg administered during pregnancy at Weeks 0, 10, 19, 28, and 36. (A) Mean predicted total plasma concentrations of perampanel. (B) Mean predicted unbound plasma concentrations of perampanel
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Predicted steady‐state pharmacokinetic profiles of perampanel 8 mg administered once daily for 240 days (5760 h) plus post‐dosing follow‐up period in pregnant and non‐pregnant women

References

    1. Wang M, Li W, Tao Y, Zhao L. Emerging trends and knowledge structure of epilepsy during pregnancy research for 2000–2018: a bibliometric analysis. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veroniki AA, Cogo E, Rios P, Straus SE, Finkelstein Y, Kealey R, et al. Comparative safety of anti‐epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes. BMC Med. 2017;15:95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacDonald SC, Bateman BT, McElrath TF, Hernandez‐Diaz S. Mortality and morbidity during delivery hospitalization among pregnant women with epilepsy in the United States. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:981–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Davis RL, Chan KA, Finkelstein JA, Fortman K, et al. Prescription drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:398–407. - PubMed
    1. Pariente G, Leibson T, Carls A, Adams‐Webber T, Ito S, Koren G. Pregnancy‐associated changes in pharmacokinetics: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002160. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms