Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 24;21(5):1562.
doi: 10.3390/s21051562.

A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies for Wearable Sleep Staging

Syed Anas Imtiaz. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Designing wearable systems for sleep detection and staging is extremely challenging due to the numerous constraints associated with sensing, usability, accuracy, and regulatory requirements. Several researchers have explored the use of signals from a subset of sensors that are used in polysomnography (PSG), whereas others have demonstrated the feasibility of using alternative sensing modalities. In this paper, a systematic review of the different sensing modalities that have been used for wearable sleep staging is presented. Based on a review of 90 papers, 13 different sensing modalities are identified. Each sensing modality is explored to identify signals that can be obtained from it, the sleep stages that can be reliably identified, the classification accuracy of systems and methods using the sensing modality, as well as the usability constraints of the sensor in a wearable system. It concludes that the two most common sensing modalities in use are those based on electroencephalography (EEG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). EEG-based systems are the most accurate, with EEG being the only sensing modality capable of identifying all the stages of sleep. PPG-based systems are much simpler to use and better suited for wearable monitoring but are unable to identify all the sleep stages.

Keywords: sleep; sleep scoring; sleep sensors; sleep staging; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of papers published each year since 2010 related to the topic of wearable sleep staging.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sleep SOS Report: The Impact of Sleep on Society. The Sleep Alliance; San Diego, CA, USA: 2007.
    1. Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Sleep Medicine and Research; Colten H.R., Altevogt B.M., editors. Sleep Disorders and Sleep Deprivation: An Unmet Public Health Problem. The National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu S.Y., Perez M.A., Lau N. The impact of sleep disorders on driving safety—Findings from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program naturalistic driving study. Sleep. 2018;41:zsy023. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsy023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garbarino S., Lanteri P., Durando P., Magnavita N., Sannita W. Co-Morbidity, Mortality, Quality of Life and the Healthcare/Welfare/Social Costs of Disordered Sleep: A Rapid Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2016;13:831. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080831. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaughn B.V., Giallanza P. Technical Review of Polysomnography. Chest. 2008;134:1310–1319. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0812. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types