Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Feb 24;13(3):174.
doi: 10.3390/toxins13030174.

A New Peritoneal Dialysis Solution Containing L-Carnitine and Xylitol for Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: First Clinical Experience

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A New Peritoneal Dialysis Solution Containing L-Carnitine and Xylitol for Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: First Clinical Experience

Carmela Rago et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a feasible and effective renal replacement therapy (RRT) thanks to the dialytic properties of the peritoneal membrane (PM). Preservation of PM integrity and transport function is the key to the success of PD therapy, particularly in the long term, since the prolonged exposure to unphysiological hypertonic glucose-based PD solutions in current use is detrimental to the PM, with progressive loss of peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity causing technique failure. Moreover, absorbing too much glucose intraperitoneally from the dialysate may give rise to a number of systemic metabolic effects. Here we report the preliminary results of the first clinical experience based on the use in continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients of novel PD solutions obtained through partly replacing the glucose load with other osmotically active metabolites, such as L-carnitine and xylitol. Ten CAPD patients were treated for four weeks with the new solutions. There was good tolerance to the experimental PD solutions, and no adverse safety signals were observed. Parameters of dialysis efficiency including creatinine clearance and urea Kt/V proved to be stable as well as fluid status, diuresis, and total peritoneal ultrafiltration. The promising tolerance and local/systemic advantages of using L-carnitine and xylitol in the PD solution merit further research.

Keywords: CAPD; PD fluid; carnitine; end-stage renal disease; peritoneal dialysis; peritoneum; solution; xylitol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.A. is a founder and co-owner of Iperboreal Pharma, an R&D company based in Italy. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had a role in the design of the study and in the writing of the manuscript; the funder had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual data points and median (-) of peritoneal equilibration test (PET) and diuresis of group A and group B data lumped together. UF, ultrafiltration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual data points and median (-) of dialysis efficiency parameters of group A and group B data lumped together. UF, ultrafiltration. * p < 0.02 vs. day 0.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study design.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Study flowchart. a) Clinical parameters include diuresis. b) Clinical chemistry: serum sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, total protein, albumin, GOT (AST), GPT (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin, glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine. c) Hematology consists of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell count and differential, and platelet count. * at day -28, determination of uric acid only.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howell M., Walker R.C., Howard K. Cost effectiveness of dialysis modalities: A systemic review of 723 economic evaluations. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy. 2019;17:315–330. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-00455-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gokal R., Mallick R.P. Peritoneal dialysis. Lancet. 1999;353:823–828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09410-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mehrotra R., Devuyst O., Davies S.J., Johnson D.W. The current state of peritoneal dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rippe B. A three-pore model of peritoneal transport. Perit. Dial. Int. 1993;13:S35–S38. doi: 10.1177/089686089301302S09. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kramer A., Pippias M., Noordzij M., Stel V.S., Afentakis N., Ambühl P.M., Andrusev A.M., Fuster E.A., Monzón F.E.A., Åsberg A., et al. The European Renal Association—European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA)—Registry Annual Report 739 2015: A summary. Clin. Kidney J. 2018;11:108–122. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx149. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources