Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 18;10(2):389.
doi: 10.3390/plants10020389.

Bacteria as Biocontrol Tool against Phytoparasitic Nematodes

Affiliations
Review

Bacteria as Biocontrol Tool against Phytoparasitic Nematodes

Varvara D Migunova et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Phytoparasitic nematodes cause severe damage and yield losses to numerous agricultural crops. Considering the revision of the EU legislation on the use of pesticides on agricultural crops, control strategies with low environmental impact are required. The approach based on the use of bacteria seems particularly promising as it also helps to reduce the applied amounts of chemicals and stabilize ecological changes. This paper gives an overview of the main types of bacteria that can be used as biological control agents against plant parasitic nematodes and their interrelationships with plants and other organisms. Many experiments have given positive results of phytoparasitic nematode control by bacteria, showing possible prospects for their application. In vitro, greenhouse and field experiments have shown that bacteria can regulate the development of ecto- and endoparasitic nematodes by different modes of action. Triggering the induction of plant defense mechanisms by bacteria is seen as the optimum tool because the efficacy of bacterial treatment can be higher than that of chemical pesticides or at least close to it. Moreover, bacterial application produces additional positive effects on growth stimulation, raises yields and suppresses other pathogenic microorganisms. Commercial formulations, both as single bacterial strains and bacterial complexes, are examined.

Keywords: Bacillus; Pseudomonas; Serratia; bioformulations; biological control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitiku M. Plant-parasitic nematodes and their management: A review. Agric. Res. Technol. 2018;8:30–38. doi: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.16.55580. - DOI
    1. Sasanelli N., Toderas I., Ircu-Straistaru E., Rusu S., Migunova V., Konrat A. Book of International Symposium “Functional Ecology of Animals”. SIBIMOL; Chisinau, Republic of Moldova: 2018. Yield losses caused by plant parasitic nematodes graphical estimation; pp. 319–329.
    1. Agrios G.N. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press; Burlington, NJ, USA: 2005. Plant diseases caused by nematodes; pp. 825–874.
    1. Nicol J.M., Turner S.J., Coyne D.L., Nijs L., Hockland S., Maafi Z.T. Current nematode threats to world agriculture. In: Jones J., editor. Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2011. pp. 21–43.
    1. Mucksood A.G., Khan T.A. Studies on the interactive effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium solani on Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill. Int. J. Bot. 2011;7:205–208. doi: 10.3923/ijb.2011.205.208. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources