Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 17;10(4):809.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10040809.

Negligible Correlation between Radiographic Measurements and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Following Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Affiliations

Negligible Correlation between Radiographic Measurements and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Following Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Daniel P Berthold et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Previous attempts to measure lateralization, distalization or inclination after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) and to correlate them with clinical outcomes have been made in the past years. However, this is considered to be too demanding and challenging for daily clinical practice. Additionally, the reported findings were obtained from heterogeneous rTSA cohorts using 145° and 155° designs and are limited in external validity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic preoperative and postoperative radiographic factors affecting clinical outcomes in patients following rTSA using a 135° prosthesis design. In a multi-center design, patients undergoing primary rTSA using a 135° design were included. Radiographic analysis included center of rotation (COR), acromiohumeral distance (AHD), lateral humeral offset (LHO), distalization shoulder angle (DSA), lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), critical shoulder angle (CSA), and glenoid and baseplate inclination. Radiographic measurements were correlated to clinical and functional outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (STT), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, active forward elevation (AFE), external rotation (AER), and abduction (AABD), at a minimum 2-year follow-up. There was a significant correlation between both DSA (r = 0.299; p = 0.020) and LSA (r = -0.276; p = 0.033) and the degree of AFE at final follow-up. However, no correlation between DSA (r = 0.133; p = 0.317) and LSA (r = -0.096; p = 0.471) and AER was observed. Postoperative AHD demonstrated a significant correlation with final AFE (r = 0.398; p = 0.002) and SST (r = 0.293; p = 0.025). Further, postoperative LHO showed a significant correlation with ASES (r = -0.281; p = 0.030) and LSA showed a significant correlation with ASES (r = -0.327; p = 0.011), SANE (r = -0.308, p = 0.012), SST (r = -0.410; p = 0.001), and VAS (r = 0.272; p = 0.034) at terminal follow-up. All other correlations were found to be non-significant (p > 0.05, respectively). Negligible correlations between pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements and clinical outcomes following primary rTSA using a 135° prosthesis design were demonstrated; however, these observations are of limited predictive value for outcomes following rTSA. Subsequently, there remains a debate regarding the ideal placement of the components during rTSA to most sufficiently restore active ROM while minimizing complications such as component loosening and scapular notching. Additionally, as the data from this study show, there is still a considerable lack of data in assessing radiographic prosthesis positioning in correlation to clinical outcomes. As such, the importance of radiographic measurements and their correlation with clinical and functional outcomes following rTSA may be limited.

Keywords: DSA; LSA; distalization; lateralization; radiographic analysis; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors B.D.P., M.D., M.L.M. and B.J.B., C.A.R. declare that they have no conflict of interest. A.D.M. reports research grants from Arthrex Inc., is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc. D.P.J. is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc. L.E. is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc. C.M.P. receives personal fees from Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA). Gobezie R is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc. R.A.R. receives material or orther financial support from AANA; is a board or committee member of Amercian Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Receives financial and material support from Arthrex Inc. ansd receives royalties from Arthrex Inc; receives other financial or material support from Mayor League Baseball; is an Editorial or governing board for Orthopedics and a board or committee member for Orthopedics Today; receives research support from Paragen Technologies and holds stock or stock options for Paragen Technologies; Is an editorial or governing board for SAGE; receives royalties and material support by Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier; receives royalties or material support for SLACK incorporated and is a editorial or governing board for SLACK incorporated; is an editorial or governing board for Wolters Kluwer Health. K Beitzel is a consultant for Arthrex Inc. and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Preoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD; green line); (b) postoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD; green line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Preoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO; green line); (b) postoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO; green line).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Lateralization shoulder angle (LSA); (b) distalization shoulder angle (DSA).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Glenoid inclination (green angle); (b) baseplate inclination (green line).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Critical shoulder angle (CSA; green angle); (b) center of rotation (COI; green line).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flowchart displaying inclusion criteria.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Scatterplot showing the linear correlation between DSA and LSA for final AFE. Good final AFE could be seen for DSA between 40 and 60° and LSA between 80 and 100°; Abbreviations: DSA = distalization shoulder angle; LSA = lateralization shoulder angle; AFE = active forward elevation.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scatterplot showing the linear correlation between LSA and DSA for final AFE. Good final AFE could be seen for DSA between 40 and 60° and LSA between 80 and 100°. Abbreviations: DSA = distalization shoulder angle; LSA = lateralization shoulder angle; AFE = active forward elevation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Routman H.D., Flurin P.H., Wright T.W., Zuckerman J.D., Hamilton M.A., Roche C.P. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Prosthesis Design Classification System. Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt. Dis. 2015;73:S5–S14. - PubMed
    1. Grammont P. Etude et réalisation d’une nouvelle prothèse d’épaule. Rheumatologie. 1987;39:27–38.
    1. Grammont P.M., Baulot E. Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics. 1993;16:65–68. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19930101-11. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boileau P., Watkinson D.J., Hatzidakis A.M., Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanics. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:147s–161s. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boileau P., Moineau G., Roussanne Y., O’Shea K. Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: Minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011;469:2558–2567. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1775-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources