Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 15;8(2):25.
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8020025.

Computational Challenges in Tissue Engineering for the Spine

Affiliations
Review

Computational Challenges in Tissue Engineering for the Spine

André P G Castro. Bioengineering (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper deals with a brief review of the recent developments in computational modelling applied to innovative treatments of spine diseases. Additionally, it provides a perspective on the research directions expected for the forthcoming years. The spine is composed of distinct and complex tissues that require specific modelling approaches. With the advent of additive manufacturing and increasing computational power, patient-specific treatments have moved from being a research trend to a reality in clinical practice, but there are many issues to be addressed before such approaches become universal. Here, it is identified that the major setback resides in validation of these computational techniques prior to approval by regulatory agencies. Nevertheless, there are very promising indicators in terms of optimised scaffold modelling for both disc arthroplasty and vertebroplasty, powered by a decisive contribution from imaging methods.

Keywords: biomechanics; finite element modelling; intervertebral disc; spine; tissue engineering; vertebrae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a common pathway for patient-specific finite element (FE) modelling of the spine, going from medical imaging to the final FE model.

References

    1. Whatley B.R., Wen X. Intervertebral disc (IVD): Structure, degeneration, repair and regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2012;32:61–77. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2011.10.011. - DOI
    1. Foster N.E., Anema J.R., Cherkin D., Chou R., Cohen S.P., Gross D.P., Ferreira P.H., Fritz J.M., Koes B.W., Peul W., et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: Evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391:2368–2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartvigsen J., Hancock M.J., Kongsted A., Louw Q., Ferreira M.L., Genevay S., Hoy D., Karppinen J., Pransky G., Sieper J., et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391:2356–2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geurts J.W., Willems P.C., Kallewaard J.W., Van Kleef M., Dirksen C. The Impact of Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Costs and Patients’ Burden. Pain Res. Manag. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/4696180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urban J.P.G., Fairbank J.C.T. Current perspectives on the role of biomechanical loading and genetics in development of disc degeneration and low back pain; a narrative review. J. Biomech. 2020;102:109573. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109573. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources