Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb 15;9(2):154.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020154.

A Critical Review about Different Vaccines against Classical Swine Fever Virus and Their Repercussions in Endemic Regions

Affiliations
Review

A Critical Review about Different Vaccines against Classical Swine Fever Virus and Their Repercussions in Endemic Regions

Liani Coronado et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Classical swine fever (CSF) is, without any doubt, one of the most devasting viral infectious diseases affecting the members of Suidae family, which causes a severe impact on the global economy. The reemergence of CSF virus (CSFV) in several countries in America, Asia, and sporadic outbreaks in Europe, sheds light about the serious concern that a potential global reemergence of this disease represents. The negative aspects related with the application of mass stamping out policies, including elevated costs and ethical issues, point out vaccination as the main control measure against future outbreaks. Hence, it is imperative for the scientific community to continue with the active investigations for more effective vaccines against CSFV. The current review pursues to gather all the available information about the vaccines in use or under developing stages against CSFV. From the perspective concerning the evolutionary viral process, this review also discusses the current problematic in CSF-endemic countries.

Keywords: DIVA concept; classical swine fever; genetic variability; multi-epitope vaccines; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moennig V., Floegel-Niesmann G., Greiser-Wilke I. Clinical Signs and Epidemiology of Classical Swine Fever: A Review of New Knowledge. Vet. J. 2003;165:11–20. doi: 10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00112-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moennig V. The control of classical swine fever in wild boar. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:1211. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01211. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith D.B., Meyers G., Bukh J., Gould E.A., Monath T., Scott Muerhoff A., Pletnev A., Rico-Hesse R., Stapleton J.T., Simmonds P., et al. Proposed revision to the taxonomy of the genus Pestivirus, family Flaviviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017;98:2106–2112. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. OIE M. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. Volume 2. Office International des Epizooties; Paris, France: 2014. Classical swine fever (Hog colera) pp. 1–25.
    1. Beer M., Goller K.V., Staubach C., Blome S. Genetic variability and distribution of Classical swine fever virus. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2015;16:33–36. doi: 10.1017/S1466252315000109. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources