Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 23;13(2):290.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020290.

Modulation of Inflammatory Mediators by Polymeric Nanoparticles Loaded with Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Affiliations

Modulation of Inflammatory Mediators by Polymeric Nanoparticles Loaded with Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

Gloria María Pontes-Quero et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

The first-line treatment of osteoarthritis is based on anti-inflammatory drugs, the most currently used being nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors and corticoids. Most of them present cytotoxicity and low bioavailability in physiological conditions, making necessary the administration of high drug concentrations causing several side effects. The goal of this work was to encapsulate three hydrophobic anti-inflammatory drugs of different natures (celecoxib, tenoxicam and dexamethasone) into core-shell terpolymer nanoparticles with potential applications in osteoarthritis. Nanoparticles presented hydrodynamic diameters between 110 and 130 nm and almost neutral surface charges (between -1 and -5 mV). Encapsulation efficiencies were highly dependent on the loaded drug and its water solubility, having higher values for celecoxib (39-72%) followed by tenoxicam (20-24%) and dexamethasone (14-26%). Nanoencapsulation reduced celecoxib and dexamethasone cytotoxicity in human articular chondrocytes and murine RAW264.7 macrophages. Moreover, the three loaded systems did not show cytotoxic effects in a wide range of concentrations. Celecoxib and dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticles reduced the release of different inflammatory mediators (NO, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, PGE2 and IL-10) by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7. Tenoxicam-loaded nanoparticles reduced NO and PGE2 production, although an overexpression of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 was observed. Finally, all nanoparticles proved to be biocompatible in a subcutaneous injection model in rats. These findings suggest that these loaded nanoparticles could be suitable candidates for the treatment of inflammatory processes associated with osteoarthritis due to their demonstrated in vitro activity as regulators of inflammatory mediator production.

Keywords: celecoxib; dexamethasone; inflammatory mediators; nanoparticles; osteoarthritis; tenoxicam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gloria María Pontes-Quero is a doctoral PhD student financially supported by the company ALODIA Farmacéutica and Comunidad de Madrid. Juan Pérez is the CEO and founder of ALODIA Farmacéutica. ALODIA Farmacéutica had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Physicochemical properties of CLX, TNX and DEX-loaded NPs. (A) NP suspensions obtained by the nanoprecipitation method. Image created using ChemDraw. (B) NP size distribution immediately after synthesis. (C) Hydrodynamic diameter (Dh), polydispersity index (PDI) and zeta potential (ξ) values of NPs. (D) SEM micrographs of CLX-10, TNX-5 and DEX-15 NPs. Scale bar: 300 nm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of (A) CLX, (B) TNX and (C) DEX NPs on HC-a viability after 24 and 48 h, 7 and 14 days. Mean ± SD values are relative to control cells without NP treatment (CNT) for each time, in which cell viability was taken as 100%. ANOVA of the results was performed with respect to their corresponding CNT at a significance level of p < 0.05 (a, b, c and d correspond to statistical significance for 24 h, 48 h, 7 and 14 days samples, respectively).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Effect of CLX, TNX and DEX NPs on RAW264.7 viability after 24 h. Mean ± SD values are relative to control cells without NP treatment (CNT), in which cell viability was taken as 100%. ANOVA of the results was performed with respect to CNT at a significance level of * p < 0.05. (B) Effect of CLX, TNX and DEX NPs on NO production in LPS-stimulated cells. Mean ± SD values are relative to control LPS+, in which NO production was taken as 100%. CLX-20 NPs at a concentration of 1.00 mg mL−1 were not tested since they showed cytotoxic effects on the AlamarBlue® viability test. ANOVA of the results was performed with respect to LPS+ at significance levels of * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of CLX-10 and DEX-15 NPs (0.50 mg mL−1) on the production of inflammatory mediators that were upregulated in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 (LPS) using a mouse inflammation antibody array. Mean ± SD values are relative to the positive control of each membrane, which was given an arbitrary value of 1. ANOVA between inflammatory (LPS) and treatment membranes (LPS + CLX-10 and DEX-15) was performed at significance levels of * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of CLX-10, TNX-5 and DEX-15 (0.50 mg mL−1) on the release of the inflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, PGE2 and IL-10 in LPS+ RAW264.7 using ELISA kits. Data are represented as mean ± SD values. ANOVA between each NP formulation and LPS+ (* p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001) and between NPs (# p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001) were performed.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Representative histological photomicrographs of skin cross-sections of rats subcutaneously injected with CLX-10, TNX-5 and DEX-15 NPs compared to the control group after one week. In the image corresponding to CLX-10-treated rats, some tissue reaction (squared and amplified in Figure S5) was observed, mainly based on macrophage infiltration (H-E).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Representative histological photomicrographs of skin cross-sections of rats subcutaneously injected with CLX-10, TNX-5 and DEX-15-loaded NPs compared to the control group after two weeks. (H-E).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!) Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013;21:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldring M.B., Otero M. Inflammation in osteoarthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2011;23:471–478. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328349c2b1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minguzzi M., Cetrullo S., D’Adamo S., Silvestri Y., Flamigni F., Borzi R.M. Emerging Players at the Intersection of Chondrocyte Loss of Maturational Arrest, Oxidative Stress, Senescence and Low-Grade Inflammation in Osteoarthritis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018;2018:3075293. doi: 10.1155/2018/3075293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang H., Cai D., Bai X. Macrophages regulate the progression of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2020;28:555–561. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Konttinen Y.T., Sillat T., Barreto G., Ainola M., Nordstrom D.C. Osteoarthritis as an autoinflammatory disease caused by chondrocyte-mediated inflammatory responses. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:613–616. doi: 10.1002/art.33451. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources