Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 5;21(1):185.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03682-z.

Prevalence and clinical, social, and health care predictors of miscarriage

Affiliations

Prevalence and clinical, social, and health care predictors of miscarriage

Erin Strumpf et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy loss is common and several factors (e.g. chromosomal anomalies, parental age) are known to increase the risk of occurrence. However, much existing research focuses on recurrent loss; comparatively little is known about the predictors of a first miscarriage. Our objective was to estimate the population-level prevalence of miscarriages and to assess the contributions of clinical, social, and health care use factors as predictors of the first detected occurrence of these losses.

Methods: In this population-based cohort study, we used linked administrative health data to estimate annual rates of miscarriage in the Manitoba population from 2003 to 2014, as a share of identified pregnancies. We compared the unadjusted associations between clinical, social, and health care use factors and first detected miscarriage compared with a live birth. We estimated multivariable generalized linear models to assess whether risk factors were associated with first detected miscarriage controlling for other predictors.

Results: We estimated an average annual miscarriage rate of 11.3%. In our final sample (n = 79,978 women), the fully-adjusted model indicated that use of infertility drugs was associated with a 4 percentage point higher risk of miscarriage (95% CI 0.02, 0.06) and a past suicide attempt with a 3 percentage point higher risk (95% CI -0.002, 0.07). Women with high morbidity were twice as likely to experience a miscarriage compared to women with low morbidity (RD = 0.12, 95% CI 0.09, 0.15). Women on income assistance had a 3 percentage point lower risk (95% CI -0.04, -0.02).

Conclusions: We estimate that 1 in 9 pregnant women in Manitoba experience and seek care for a miscarriage. After adjusting for clinical factors, past health care use and morbidity contribute important additional information about the risk of first detected miscarriage. Social factors may also be informative.

Keywords: Health services; Manitoba; Miscarriage; Women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevalence of miscarriage, Manitoba (2003–2014)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Maternal age at miscarriage or live birth
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Maternal morbidity (RUB) in the year before the miscarriage or live birth

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Early pregnancy loss, Practice Bulletin no. 150. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1258–1267. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000465191.27155.25. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macklon NS, Geraedts JP, Fauser BC. Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’of early pregnancy loss. Human reproduction update. 2002;8(4):333–43. - PubMed
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management in EarlyPregnancy of Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage. London: RCOG; 2012. - PubMed
    1. de la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1649–1656. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1649. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding