Take home injectable opioids for opioid use disorder during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic is in urgent need: a case study
- PMID: 33673847
- PMCID: PMC7935000
- DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00358-x
Take home injectable opioids for opioid use disorder during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic is in urgent need: a case study
Abstract
Background: In North America the opioid poisoning crisis currently faces the unprecedented challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, further straining people and communities already facing structural and individual vulnerabilities. People with opioid use disorder (OUD) are facing unique challenges in response to COVID-19, such as not being able to adopt best practices (e.g., physical distancing) if they're financially insecure or living in shelters (or homeless). They also have other medical conditions that make them more likely to be immunocompromised and at risk of developing COVID-19. In response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, national and provincial regulatory bodies introduced guidance and exemptions to mitigate the spread of the virus. Among them, clinical guidance for prescribers were issued to allow take home opioid medications for opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Take Home for injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is only considered within a restrictive regulatory structure, specific to the pandemic. Nevertheless, this risk mitigation guidance allowed carries, mostly daily dispensed, to a population that would not have access to it prior to the pandemic. In this case it is presented and discussed that if a carry was possible during the pandemic, then the carry could continue post COVID-19 to address a gap in our approach to individualize care for people with OUD receiving iOAT.
Case presentation: Here we present the first case of a patient in Canada with long-term OUD that received take home injectable diacetylmorphine to self-isolate in an approved site after being diagnosed with COVID-19 during a visit to the emergency room where he was diagnosed with cellulitis and admitted to receive antibiotics.
Conclusion: In the present case we demonstrated that it is feasible to provide iOAT outside the community clinic with no apparent negative consequences. Improving upon and making permanent these recently introduced risk mitigating guidance during COVID-19, have the potential not just to protect during the pandemic, but also to address long-overdue barriers to access evidence-based care in addiction treatment.
Keywords: Diacetylmorphine; Direct observed treatment; Injectable opioid agonist treatment; Opioid use disorder; Patient centered care; Take home doses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Similar articles
-
Clients' experiences on North America's first take-home injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) program: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 26;23(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09558-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37237256 Free PMC article.
-
"As long as that place stays open, I'll stay alive": Accessing injectable opioid agonist treatment during dual public health crises.Harm Reduct J. 2023 Apr 14;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00779-w. Harm Reduct J. 2023. PMID: 37060027 Free PMC article.
-
Client preferences for the design and delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment services: Results from a best-worst scaling task.Addiction. 2024 Dec;119(12):2139-2150. doi: 10.1111/add.16620. Epub 2024 Jul 25. Addiction. 2024. PMID: 39054406
-
Opioid agonist treatment take-home doses ('carries'): Are current guidelines resulting in low treatment coverage among high-risk populations in Canada and the USA?Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 10;19(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00671-z. Harm Reduct J. 2022. PMID: 35948961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges for the implementation of injectable opioid agonist treatment: a scoping review.Harm Reduct J. 2024 Dec 4;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01102-x. Harm Reduct J. 2024. PMID: 39633369 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clients' experiences on North America's first take-home injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) program: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 26;23(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09558-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37237256 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians' Perspectives and an Ethical Analysis of Safer Supply Opioid Prescribing.J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10387-3. Online ahead of print. J Bioeth Inq. 2024. PMID: 39466553
-
Treatment retention in opioid agonist therapy: comparison of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone by analysis of daily-witnessed dispensed medication in a Canadian Province.BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04175-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35908052 Free PMC article.
-
Primary care embedded within permanent supportive housing for people who use substances: A qualitative study examining healthcare access in Vancouver, Canada.Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5062-e5073. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13921. Epub 2022 Jul 19. Health Soc Care Community. 2022. PMID: 35852403 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences with take-home dosing in heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic-Is an update of legal restrictions warranted?Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Mar;101:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103548. Epub 2021 Nov 26. Int J Drug Policy. 2022. PMID: 34920218 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC . Combatting the Opioid Overdose Epidemic. 2020.
-
- Service BC . Illicit drug toxicity deaths in BC January 1, 2010 – September 30. 2020.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous