Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: a cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017-2019) in northwest Italy
- PMID: 33673864
- PMCID: PMC7934501
- DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04603-x
Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: a cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017-2019) in northwest Italy
Abstract
Background: Tick-borne diseases are common throughout Europe. Ticks transmit pathogens to the host while feeding and together with mosquitoes, they are major vectors of infectious agents worldwide. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the incidence of tick-bite events and tick-borne disease in northwest Italy, but information on the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks removed from humans remains scarce. To fill this gap, we report here the prevalence of tick bites and tick-borne pathogens documented for humans in Piedmont, northwest Italy, in the 3-year period 2017-2019.
Methods: Ticks attached to humans during 2017-2019 were collected from residents of urban and rural area by physicians and veterinarians working with local veterinary agencies. All ticks (n = 1290) were morphologically identified to the species level. A subset of ticks removed from children (age 0-18 years) and the elderly (> 70 years), both age groups considered to be at-risk populations, was screened by biomolecular analysis to detect pathogens (e.g. Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., Anaplasma spp.). Pathogen identity was confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Results: Ticks were taxonomically assigned to ten species of six genera (Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus). Most belonged to the genus Ixodes: 1009 ticks (78.22%) were classified as Ixodes ricinus. A subset of 500 ticks collected from the two at-risk populations were subjected to PCR assay to determine the presence of Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp., and Anaplasma spp. The overall prevalence of infection was 22.8% (n = 114; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.19-26.73%), meaning that at least one pathogen was detected: Rickettsia spp. (prevalence 15%, n = 76; 95% CI 12.17-18.65%); Borrelia spp. (prevalence 6.4%, n = 32; 95% CI 4.42-8.92%); and Anaplasma spp. (prevalence 1.2%, n = 6; 95% CI 0.44-2.6%).
Conclusions: Our data underline the importance of surveillance in the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases and the implementation of strategies to control tick infestation and associated pathogens.
Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum; Borrelia spp.; PCR; Rickettsia spp.; Tick-borne diseases.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Investigation of tick-borne bacteria (Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia spp.) in ticks collected from Andean tapirs, cattle and vegetation from a protected area in Ecuador.Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jan 24;8:46. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0662-3. Parasit Vectors. 2015. PMID: 25616567 Free PMC article.
-
Tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from birds in Taiwan.Parasit Vectors. 2017 Nov 25;10(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2535-4. Parasit Vectors. 2017. PMID: 29178908 Free PMC article.
-
The diversity of tick-borne bacteria and parasites in ticks collected from the Strandja Nature Park in south-eastern Bulgaria.Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 20;11(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2721-z. Parasit Vectors. 2018. PMID: 29554928 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the diversity of tick-borne pathogens: The case of bacteria (Anaplasma, Rickettsia, Coxiella and Borrelia) protozoa (Babesia and Theileria) and viruses (Orthonairovirus, tick-borne encephalitis virus and louping ill virus) in the European continent.Vet Microbiol. 2023 Nov;286:109892. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109892. Epub 2023 Oct 15. Vet Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37866329
-
Bacterial Agents Detected in 418 Ticks Removed from Humans during 2014-2021, France.Emerg Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;29(4):701-710. doi: 10.3201/eid2904.221572. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36957992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Risk of Exposure to Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in a Spa Town in Northern Poland.Pathogens. 2022 May 4;11(5):542. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11050542. Pathogens. 2022. PMID: 35631063 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of pathogens in ticks collected from humans in Belgium, 2021, versus 2017.Parasit Vectors. 2024 Sep 5;17(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06427-x. Parasit Vectors. 2024. PMID: 39238018 Free PMC article.
-
Tick exposure and risk of tick-borne pathogens infection in hunters and hunting dogs: a citizen science approach.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jul;69(4):e386-e393. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14314. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022. PMID: 34487635 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Rickettsia spp. in Ticks Removed from Tick-Bitten Humans in Northwestern Spain.Insects. 2024 Jul 27;15(8):571. doi: 10.3390/insects15080571. Insects. 2024. PMID: 39194776 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing zoonotic risk in a fenced natural park in northwestern Italy: integrating camera traps for a vector-host approach to investigate tick-borne pathogens.Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 3;12:1536260. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1536260. eCollection 2025. Front Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 40098889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alciati S, Belligni E, Del Colle S, Pugliese A. Human infections tick-transmitted. Panminerva Med. 2001;43(4):295–304. - PubMed
-
- Biggs HM, Behravesh CB, Bradley KK, Dahlgren FS, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne Rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever and other spotted fever group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis—United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(2):1–44. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6502a1. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous