Did the three little pigs frighten the wolf? How deaf readers use lexical and syntactic cues to comprehend sentences
- PMID: 33677384
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103908
Did the three little pigs frighten the wolf? How deaf readers use lexical and syntactic cues to comprehend sentences
Abstract
Background: The ways in which students with deafness process syntactic and semantic cues while reading sentences are unclear. While some studies have supported the preference for semantic cues, others have not.
Aim: To examine differences in the processing of syntactic versus semantic cues during sentence reading among students who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH).
Method: Twenty DHH students (mean age = 12.48 years) and 20 chronologically age-matched students with typical hearing (TH) were asked to read sentences written in Spanish with different grammatical structures and to choose the picture that best matched the sentences' meaning while their eye movements were being registered. The picture options were manipulated so that, in addition to the correct ones, there were lexical distractors and syntactic distractors.
Results: The TH participants outperformed the DHH participants in reading complex sentences but not simple sentences in the active voice. In the correctly answered trials, both groups fixated longer and made more fixations on the target than on the syntactic distractor than on the lexical distractor. DHH participants made significantly longer fixations on the lexical distractions.
Conclusions: Our results did not support a strict preference for either lexical or semantic cues in the DHH participants.
Keywords: Complex sentences; Eye tracking; Grammatical comprehension; Semantic cues; Syntactic cues.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Resolving syntactic-semantic conflicts: comprehension and processing patterns by deaf Chinese readers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Jun 24;29(3):396-411. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enae008. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024. PMID: 38439566
-
Time-Course of Grammatical Processing in Deaf Readers: An Eye-Movement Study.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 May 30;25(3):351-364. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa005. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020. PMID: 32173744 Review.
-
Semantic and syntactic reading comprehension strategies used by deaf children with early and late cochlear implantation.Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:153-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Res Dev Disabil. 2016. PMID: 26704778
-
Deaf readers' response to syntactic complexity: evidence from self-paced reading.Mem Cognit. 2014 Jan;42(1):97-111. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0346-1. Mem Cognit. 2014. PMID: 23868696 Free PMC article.
-
Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):419-36. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr013. Epub 2011 May 4. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21543723 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing sensitivity to semantic and syntactic information in deaf readers: An ERP study.Neuropsychologia. 2025 Aug 13;215:109171. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109171. Epub 2025 May 15. Neuropsychologia. 2025. PMID: 40381885 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources