Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Mar 16;33(1):mzab033.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab033.

COVID-19 in aged care homes: a comparison of effects initial government policies had in the UK (primarily focussing on England) and Australia during the first wave

Affiliations
Comparative Study

COVID-19 in aged care homes: a comparison of effects initial government policies had in the UK (primarily focussing on England) and Australia during the first wave

Daniel Kam Yin Chan et al. Int J Qual Health Care. .

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact globally, with older people living in aged care homes suffering high death rates.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the impact of initial government policies on this vulnerable older population between the UK and Australia during the first wave of attack.

Methods: We searched websites of governments in the UK and Australia and media outlets. We examined the key policies including the national lockdown dates and the distribution of some important resources (personal protective equipment and testing) and the effects of these initial policies on the mortality rates in the aged care homes during the first wave of attack of COVID-19.

Results: We found that both countries had prioritized resources to hospitals over aged care homes during the first wave of attack. Both countries had lower priority for aged care residents in hospitals (e.g. discharging without testing for COVID-19 or discouraging admissions). However, deaths in aged care homes were 270 times higher in the UK than in Australia as on 7 May 2020 (despite UK having a population only 2.5 times larger than Australia). The lower fatality rate in Australia may have been due to the earlier lockdown strategy when the total daily cases were low in Australia (118) compared to the UK (over 1000), as well as the better community viral testing regime in Australia.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the public health policy in Australia aimed towards earlier intervention with earlier national lockdown and more viral testing to prevent new cases. This primary prevention could have resulted in more lives being saved. In contrast, the initial policy in the UK focussed mainly on protecting resources for hospitals, and there was a delay in national lockdown intervention and lower viral testing rate, resulting in more lives lost in the aged care sector.

Keywords: Australia; COVID-19 outbreaks; UK; aged care homes; government policies; lockdown; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lockdown dates (in textbox) and daily new cases in the UK and Australia.

References

    1. Daily New Cases in United Kingdom and Daily New Cases in Australia . https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/ (1 August 2020, date last accessed).
    1. Aged Care Providers withCovid-19 CasesHadto Ask for PPE from Emergency Stockpile. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/01/aged-care-providers-with-c... (31 May 2020, date last accessed).
    1. No Plan for Daily Coronavirus Testing of Aged-Care StaffacrossAustralia, Minister Says. https://healthcarechannel.co/no-plan-for-daily-coronavirus-testing-of-ag... (31 May 2020, date last accessed).
    1. MacLellan K, Piper E. Reuters. UK denies sacrificing care homes; Johnson says situation improving. https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/uk-denies-sacrificing-care-homes-jo... (5 March 2021, date last accessed).
    1. Cesari M, Proietti M. COVID-19 in Italy: ageism and decision-making in a pandemic. JAMDA 2020;21:576–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms