Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jun;278(6):1743-1753.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06724-6. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

Endoscopic surgical treatment for rhinogenic contact point headache: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic surgical treatment for rhinogenic contact point headache: systematic review and meta-analysis

Antonino Maniaci et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis study was designed to analyze endoscopic surgery's role in treating rhinogenic contact point headache.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of the last 20 years' English language regarding Rhinogenic contact point headache and endoscopic surgery. We included the analysis papers reporting post-operative outcomes through the Visual Analogue Scale or the Migraine Disability Assessment scale.

Results: We provided 18 articles for a total of 978 RCPH patients. While 777 (81.1%) subjects underwent functional nasal surgery for RCPH, 201 patients (20.9%) were medically treated. A significant decrease from the VAS score of 7.3 ± 1.5 to 2.7 ± 1.8 was recorded (p < 0.0001). At quantitative analysis on 660 patients (11 papers), surgical treatment demonstrated significantly better post-operative scores than medical (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: At comparison, surgical treatment in patients with rhinogenic contact points exhibited significantly better values at short-term, medium-term, and long term follow up. Endoscopic surgery should be proposed as the choice method in approaching the symptomatic patient.

Keywords: Concha bullosa; Endoscopic surgery; Rhinogenic contact point headache; Septal deviation; Septal spur.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
QUADAS-2: the graphical display shows the possible risk of bias
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot between surgical vs medical pre-operative and post-operative VAS scores. CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subanalysis forest chart distinguishing patients based on follow-up term. CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box plot pre- and post-operative outcomes’ comparison between surgery and medical therapy. Improvement in VAS scores of the medical therapy did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.57)

Comment in

References

    1. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (2004). The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24 Suppl 1: 9–160. - PubMed
    1. Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JWS, Rief W, et al. IASP Taskforce for the classification of chronic pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain. Pain. 2019;160(1):28–37. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001390. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benoliel R, Svensson P, Evers S, et al. IASP taskforce for the classification of chronic pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary headache or orofacial pain. Pain. 2019;160(1):60–68. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001435. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McAuliffe GW, Goodell H, Wolff HG. Experimental studies on headache: pain from the nasal and a paranasal structure. Assoc Res Nerv Mental Dis. 1943;23:185–208.
    1. Baraniuk JN, Lundgren JD, Okayama M, et al. Substance P and neurokinin A in human nasal mucosa. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1991;4(3):228–236. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb/4.3.228. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources